Blog
THE RACHELL REPORT
Harris County District Attorney’s Office Discloses “Cascading, System-Wide Breakdown” Led to Wrongful Conviction and 6 Years Imprisonment of Innocent Man
By: Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
On December 14, 2008, we posted a blog titledThe Conflicting Faces of Crime. One of those faces involved the wrongful conviction of Ricardo Rachell in 2003 for the aggravated sexual assault of an eight year old boy. Rachell was released from custody in December 2008 after he was exonerated by DNA evidence. The Harris County District Attorney’s Office and the Houston Police Department undertook a joint investigation to determine what went wrong in the Rachell case. On March 12, 2009, the two law enforcement agencies released the “Rachell Report” (“report”) which concluded that Rachell’s wrongful conviction was the result of a “cascading, system-wide breakdown.”
The “breakdown” in the Rachell case actually began outside the system. The report states that on Sunday, October 20, 2002, the eight year old boy “was observed running down Griggs Road, waving his hands in the air and crying.” An elderly man went to the child’s aid by taking him to Wyatt’s Cafeteria. Two women then took the boy home. The child did not convey to any of these people that he had been sexually assaulted. “He just stated that a man had a knife and was trying to kill him,” the report said. He did not provide a description of the attacker to these witnesses either.
Once home, patrol officers from the police department were summoned. The boy told these officers that a man had tried to kill him. The report does not indicate if the boy told these patrol officers the man had either tried or had actually sexually assaulted him. The report only stated that:
“The details he gave officers that night was that he was offered ten dollars to pick up trash and the man took him on the man’s bicycle. The location where he was abducted was the 3700 block of Southlawn. Those first officers did speak with the Complainant’s six year old friend who was with him just before the suspect took Complainant on his bike. The six year old also conveyed that the Complainant was offered ten dollars to pick up trash and was on a bicycle. The only description of the suspect in the offense report is that he was an unknown black male, age 30.”
The following morning the boy’s mother kept her son out of school and at home. As she was returning home from taking another son to school, she saw Rachell who she believed was the man who had taken her eight year old son. This is where the initial breakdown began. The report does not indicate whether the boy had ever told his mother that the man had either attempted or had actually sexually assaulted him. The report does state that the mother gathered up two friends and the boy and went looking for Rachell. She found him walking down a street in the neighborhood.
“She asked her son if this person was the attacker; he replied affirmatively,” the report states. “She followed [Rachell] to his mother’s house and the police were called. Patrol officers arrived and find [sic] the mother in a verbal confrontation with Rachell. Rachell was placed in the back of the patrol car and the patrol officer pulled the Complainant aside and asked him if Rachell is the person who kidnapped him. The Complainant stated that he was the person. The Complainant told this officer,
M. Wilson, that Rachell had taken him to a vacant lot, pulled down his pants, and held him by his waist from behind. An adult female interviewed by the officer states she did not see the abduction, but observed [Rachell] in the area around the time of the Complainant’s ‘disappearance’. Officer Wilson calls DA Intake; ADA James Alston declined to accept charges and requested further investigation. Rachell is released.”
The case had become irreparably tainted at that juncture. The mother was convinced Rachell was the attacker. She took the boy, along with two of her friends for support, to find Rachell so he could be “identified.” Before the patrol officers could even arrive, the mother had engaged herself in a “verbal confrontation” with Rachell which only reinforced the “identification” of Rachell for her son.
Heeding Alston’s instructions, Officer Wilson continued the investigation through the day on October 21. The officer found a vacant home on Foster Street where there had been a forced entry, muddy footprints leading to a second floor bedroom, and bicycle tracks in the yard next door. These findings corroborated the boy’s story.
Later that same afternoon Officer Lisa Clemons, a member of the HPD Juvenile Sex Crimes Unit, was assigned to the case. She contacted the boy’s mother to make arrangements for the boy to be interviewed by the Children’s Assessment Center (CAC). In a subsequent interview with a CAC forensic interviewer, the boy admitted that he had been sexually assaulted by the abductor. The report states the boy added:
“He stated that [his attacker] is a bright-skinned black man with a messed up eye and no teeth. He stated that the man’s face got messed up because he was looking in people’s windows and someone shot him. When asked how he knows this, he responded that is what people say in the neighborhood. He stated that the suspect had a scarf in his mouth, had blue pants, a tee shirt, and had dark glasses on. He tells the interviewer that he had seen Rachell in the neighborhood once before, when Rachell was throwing rocks at some boys.”
Clearly, the child’s identification at this point had become hopelessly contaminated. The “people” in the neighborhood, led by his own mother and friends, had become consumed by a “lynch-mob” mentality. Rachell had to be the attacker. He rode a bike and he was terribly disfigured. And that is the most disturbing aspect of this case. At no point when the boy was assisted by the elderly man and two women following the attack, or when he interviewed by theinitial patrol officers, or or when he interviewed by Officer Wilson did the boy state that he had been sexually assaulted by the disfigured man he knew as Rachell.Not even a child abducted and sexually assaulted by someone as horribly disfigured as Rachell would neglect to make this known to the police and his mother. Rachell became the “man on the bike” to the boy after his mother took him to Rachell’s mother’s home where she confronted the person “she” believed was responsible for her son’s abduction.
After the October 21 CAC interview, the boy was given a “sexual assault exam” by a registered nurse named Deborah Parks. After the examination, Parks delivered the exam’s kit to Officer Clemons.
Officer Clemons then proceeded to interview the boy’s mother who related to the officer the incident that occurred earlier in the day when she spotted Rachell and confronted him at his mother’s house. The report at this juncture significantly notes that the Clemons offense report “does not state the basis of the Mother’s initial conclusion that [Rachell] was the same person who had attacked her son.” In any event, Officer Clemons contacted Officer Wilson who confirmed the incident at Rachell’s mother’s house and that the boy had “positively identified Rachell.”
The mother also provided Officer Clemons with critical physical evidence. She had saved the clothes her son was wearing the day of the attack and placed them in a bag. She told the officer that her son’s underwear had a “yellowish cream substance” in the seat and this concerned her. After tagging them, Officer Clemons took the bag of clothes and rape kit to the HPD property room that same afternoon. The next day the officer filed a supplemental report requesting that evidence be analyzed by the Houston Crime Lab for fluid and fiber evidence.Why this was never done remains unknown.
After preparing her report, Officer Clemons spoke by phone to Assistant District Attorney C. Serna. The officer briefed the ADA on the investigation and the ADA approved a charge of “aggravated sexual assault of a Child” against Rachell. The next day, October 23, Officer Clemons went to the District Attorney’s office and personally presented the evidence in the case to Assistant District Attorney R. Freyer who accepted the charge and filed it into the Intake Division.
On October 24, 2002, Officer Clemons arrested Rachell at his residence and requested a voluntary sample of his DNA. He consented, provided the sample, and Clemons delivered it to the HPD property room. Officer Clemons also conducted a voluntary interview with Rachell who denied attacking the child and said the victim and his family were lying.
On December 12, 2002, Officer Clemons and Officer R. Rodriquez, who was also with the juvenile sex crimes unit, went to the boy’s school and showed him a “photo spread” that included Rachell. The boy identified him as his attacker. The officers then showed the same “photo spread” to the boy’s six-year-old friend who also positively identified Rachell.
While the report does not indicate one way or the other, it can be reasonably inferred that the other photos utilized in the “photo spread” were not of men who had horribly disfigured faces. That was like putting an elephant in a “photo spread” with five rhinos and asking an attack victim to identify the animal with the trunk that attacked him.
Assistant District Attorney J. Musick drew the Rachell case for prosecution. She presented the evidence to a grand jury which returned an indictment against Rachell on January 30, 2003. While the offense reports prepared by Officer Clemons contained references to DNA evidence, ADA Musick did not request that the crime lab analyze that evidence.
Rachell’s trial was set for June 2003. Before the case could be tried, ADA Musick left the District Attorney’s Office. The Rachell case was passed to ADA J. Ortiz. The report clearly states there were “notes in the file to indicate that he [Ortiz] was aware that a sample of the Defendant’s DNA had been obtained; however, he did not request tests be performed to compare that sample to the rape kit and the clothes of the Complainant.”
The report then turned its attention Rachell’s court-appointed attorney, Ron Hayes. Known in the Harris County legal community as a competent and thorough criminal defense attorney, Hayes did not “request that his client’s DNA be compared to the rape kit or the clothes obtained from the Complainant.” Hayes stated publicly after Rachell’s DNA exoneration that he was not aware of any DNA evidence.The report pointed out, he examined witnesses during the trial “regarding the Defendant’s buccal swab and the child’s clothing and he elicited testimony to the effect that there were no forensic tests conducted. He also presented this lack of testing to the jury during his closing argument.”
During the years 2002 and 2003, the Houston Crime Lab was a major story in Harris County because of disclosed mishandling of forensic evidence, professional incompetence, and even manufactured evidence by the crime lab. DNA evidence—and its potential to exonerate wrongfully accused individuals—was the prevalent legal issue in Harris County in those years. It is, therefore, inexcusable from any perspective that the Rachell case was allowed to go to trial without the DNA evidence being tested.
The trial itself could be compared to a “Greek tragedy.” The boy’s mother testified and was asked why she believed Rachell was the man who attacked her son. “She stated it was based on the description that her son had given her the night before,” the report said. “That description was: blue pants, blue jeans, blue shirt, dark sunglasses, black shoes, and a towel in his mouth. She did not mention the deformed face. She acknowledged that when she saw the Defendant on the Monday morning she was not sure it was he, so she went home and picked up the Complainant and when he said that Rachell was the one, she knew it was he.”
The boy victim and his young friend also testified at trial and identified Rachell as the abductor/attacker. On cross examination defense attorney Hayes asked the boy victim if he noticed anything unusual about Rachell as he sat in the court room. The boy replied that Rachell’s “haircut” was unusual. He did not mention the disfigured face. The young friend testified that the attacker had worn a rag around his face as though it was a mask and had a patch over one eye.
The jury convicted Rachell on June 3, 2003, despite two jurors expressing serious reservations after the verdict because of the mother’s role in the identification process. The jury assessed Rachell’s punishment at 40 years in prison. He was shortly thereafter committed to the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
Following the denial of his direct appeal on September 30, 2004, which had been handled by attorney Shawna Reagin, Rachell filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on September 11, 2005. The petition was filed with the assistance of fellow inmates. Two years later, November 7, 2007, the habeas application was denied.
Prior to and after Rachell’s conviction, the same neighborhood in which he had lived experienced a series of sexual assaults on children committed by a man on a bicycle promising the children money in exchange for work. Rachell sent news clippings about these assaults to his attorneys, and while Hayes would later state in an affidavit that he didn’t think the other sexual assaults merited investigation, Ms. Reagin apparently made them part of the appeal record.
On September 21, 2007, Rachell sent a letter to sex crimes unit Officer Rodriquez who had investigated and arrested Andrew Wayne Hawthorne in connection with the other serial rapes. Rachell told Officer Rodriquez that Hawthorne, who had become known as the “Yellowstone Park Serial Rapist,” was the man who raped the boy that he [Rachell] had been convicted of raping.
Rodriquez turned the letter over to a Lt. Staney, and while he acknowledged a similarmodus operandiin the two cases, he “distinguished the facts of Rachell’s case from that of Hawthorne. But he did ascertain there was untested forensic evidence in Rachell’s case and requested a DNA comparison of it.
Undeterred by these setbacks, Rachell continued to press his claim of innocence. He filed what is known as a Chapter 64 request for DNA testing. on April 19, 2007, 185th Judicial District Court Judge Susan Brown appointed Deborah Summers to represent Rachell.
There was hope in the air, but it dissipated somewhat 8 months later when ADA S. Ring, who handled all Chapter 64 requests in the District Attorney’s Post Convictions Division, reviewed the file in the Rachell case, telephoned Lori Wilson at the HPD Crime Lab, and instructed her not to do any DNA testing in the Rachell case “because the Chapter 64 request was still pending.”
The report explained how: “Defense attorney Summers failed to file a Chapter 64 motion that would begin the process that would result in the testing of biological evidence; therefore Assistant District Attorney Ring proceeded to obtain affidavits from the Harris County Clerk’s Office, the HPD Property Room, and the HPD Crime Lab: Ring filed a motion in the 185th District Court on March 10, 2008 requesting that the trial court find that Mr. Rachell met the requirements of Chapter 64 and the trial court order[ed] DNA testing in the case. Evidence was sent to DPS testing on March 11, 2008. Ring requested that Mr. Rachell be bench warranted from TDCJ-ID so that a fresh buccal swab could be taken.”
In the end, it took a professional and diligent assistant district attorney to set the wheels in motion that would ultimately free Ricardo Rachell from his wrong conviction. Sally Ring had to accomplish what several assistant district attorneys and Rachell’s own court appointed attorneys had been unable to do—get the biological evidence DNA tested. This became a reality on October 28, 2008 when DPS issued a report that stated Rachell’s DNA did not match the biological evidence collected in the case.
By this time, ADA Ring had left the District Attorney’s Office. Her replacement, ADA Mark Donnelly, picked up the ball with the same professionalism exhibited by Ring. He requested that Rachell be “bench warranted so that the District Attorney’s Office could agree to a personal bond releasing Mr. Rachell from custody while a Writ was prepared and filed that would lead to the case being dismissed.” At this point attorney Summers joined with ADA Donnelly to have a bench warrant issued.
On December 12, 2008, the DPS lab issued a report that the DNA evidence “identified Andrew Wayne Hawthorne” as the real attacker of the boy in the Rachell case.
The following day, December 13, Judge Brown declared Rachell innocent and ordered him release from custody. One month later, January 13, 2009, Harris County District Attorney investigators, Dennis Field and Donald Wine, drove to the Hughes Unit in Amarillo where they interviewed Hawthorne and obtained a written confession from him.
On February 24, 2009, Hawthorne was formally charged with aggravated sexual assault of a child—the same child Ricardo Rachell had wrongfully spent six years in prison for raping.
As the District Attorney’s Office prepares for its prosecution of Hawthorne, Ricardo Rachell is preparing to undergo a series of plastic surgeries that will hopefully reconstruct his face. The surgeries will be performed by a team of volunteer surgeons led by Drs. Joe Agris, Jeffery Friedman, Norman Rappaport, and Larry Hollier. The surgeries will take place at the Methodist Hospital and their costs picked up by the Zindler-Agris Foundation.
District Attorney Pat Lykos’ office should be commended for putting the Rachell Report in the public arena. There was indeed a “system-wide breakdown” in the Harris County criminal justice system that resulted in Ricardo Rachell’s wrongful conviction. And there is more than enough blame to spread among a lot of folks, but it must be remembered that in the end it was former ADA Sally Ring and current ADA Mark Donnelly who stepped up to the plate and corrected the terrible wrong done to Rachell.
It is unfortunate, however, that the report attempts to saddle equal blame between law enforcement and Mr. Rachell’s court appointed attorneys.It is the State of Texas through its law enforcement agencies, not the solo court appointed attorneys, who have the might and the limitless resources to ensure that thorough and complete investigations are conducted.Justice should not rely upon some fortunate scenario where a defense lawyer stumbles upon a piece of critical evidence that saves the day.
This terrible string of errors and mishaps should remind all those working in the criminal justice system to stay alert and diligent when working for justice.The inherent problems in representing the indigent, such as large case loads, and lack of adequate funding to access experts and investigators, make tragedies such as Rachell’s an unavoidable fact of life in Harris County Justice Center.It can only be hoped that the lessons learned from this tragedy will prevent others from occurring in the future, that both prosecutors and defense lawyers will take this case to heart and strive for justice, not just a pay check and a notch in the belt.
By: Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
Take the first step toward protecting your freedom by contacting us now
Testimonials
John T. Floyd Law Firm
3730 Kirby Drive # 750, Houston
-
If you have hired attorneys that meet the Webster dictionary definition, ie: "Attorney " is a person that has a law degree, will not be totally honest, can take your money … More and not earn it, will put you off until he is ready to talk to you, and/or never study your case to be able to defend you. Mr. Floyd is the only attorney that doesn't fit that definition!! You will be delighted to have Mr. John Floyd in your corner! Not one attorney that I have ever met that would ever return a check that I sent to him, because he said I paid him too much! Wow! That right there should tell you something about his integrity!!!!! He has a very calm demeanor and doesn't stretch the truth even if you don't want to hear it, he will tell you the truth. Call and set up an appointment with him and judge for yourself. You are wasting time and money on any other attorney, just hire the best, Mr. Floyd.
-
John T. Floyd and his team are some of the best people! I was able to get a second opinion from them on legal advice. His team has been honest, kind, and very informative which has … More been a huge blesssing.
-
I highly recommend John T. Floyd Lawfirm. They are truly knowledgeable and willing to go the extra mile to defend your innocence. Psalms 35
-
Outstanding!Professional knowledge. Rich experiences. Good outcome.
-
-
The best lawyer I ever encounter with a very good personality. He’s very professional and he will go far and beyond for his clients best interest. He’s definitely a 5 star attorney … More when it comes to delivering. I couldn’t be more happier that I hired him !! 👏👏👏👏
-
-
I can honestly say from what I have seen so far, Floyd is a compassionate soul who cares for his client's. Floyd is by far very knowledgeable in this area. He's currently … More assisting my [Father] on a sex assault. We are all suffering so much as my father is an elder man, but we have faith in God, and Mr. Floyd he can dismissed this outrageous allegation soon. Thank you, yoli
-
I had wonderful experience with this law firm. They were so helpful and knowledgeable of the process.my case was dismissed because of Mr John T Floyd,thank you for everything .
-
I am very happy today my case dismissed God bless Mr John T Floyd very good lawyer thanks you so mush sir
-
I had a great experience with this Law Firm, the kind staff helped me locate a Lawyer even though they were unable to take my case.
They were very helpful, kind and returned my call … More in a timely manner. I would definitely recommend them and use them in the future. -
I can tell that Jone is an excellent attorney in Houston. Personally, he is a great man. In addition to great service and amazing results. Recommended
-
Mr. Floyd is an incredible attorney and human being. He cares about your case, the facts, the law, and your life! I am sorry for whatever situation you are going through, but choosing … More Mr. Floyd, his firm, and their professional experience to help you, will be the best decision you ever make!
-
John T Floyd is a straight shooter! He was very direct and responsive to my phone calls and questions. I was in awe of his knowledge, and professional decorum! The best decision that … More you could make is to schedule a consultation with him before considering anyone else!
-
I asked the Law Office of John T. Floyd a very important question regarding the legal aspects of purchasing a firearm with a deferred adjudication charge. They answered the question … More very professionally and accurately and I was quite pleased with the information that was shared. I recommend this law firm because they are very honest and will work for you and with you.
-
I’ve never been one to write reviews but this time I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to say something. I had some serious legal questions I needed answers to concerning Texas laws. … More Being I’m from another state, I found and reached out to Attorney John Floyd for the answers. Mr Floyd listened to to my requests and told me what he need from me and went out of his way to get me the answers. Very polite, straightforward and professional, I can’t thank him enough for all he’s done. Whatever your legal case may be, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Mr Floyd.
-
John & Chris helped my family member get a reduced charge and acceptable plea agreement in place. Their compassion, attention to every detail was what helped carry the day.Truly … More the best of the best.P
-
Mr. Floyd is both ethical and loyal to his clients; two qualities that are hard to find specially in lawyers. I'd definitely recommend him to anyone.Positive
Professionalism …More … More -
Mr. John was very helpful and truly was the reason why my case was dismissed. Thank you so much Mr. John I truly recommend everyone in need to work with him.
-
His service to the community and diligence to helping his clients speaks for its self! Not to mention the many articles, papers and TV appearances that speak to his intellect
-
John has given Excellent service and have been very friendly and extremely helpful to us. I highly recommend this law firm
-
This law firm is diligent, responsive and succeeded in getting my case dismissed. 10/10 would recommend.
-
super knowledgeable, good attitude, would definitely recommend him
-
Very helpful, knowledgeable and honest.
-
John is an amazing person and lawyer who is actually very understanding of how anxious I got and although it was hard to reach him sometimes because of his schedule, but never worry … More he is on top of things. He is very organized, very smart. I had the experience to go through a trial with him, and he always plans ahead well and is actually open and receptive to any ideas and comments I had and he was quick to decide which is right to use at the moment. I really appreciated working with him and Chris. Great lawyers and great people. As I was reminded by John, I am adding that the Jury reached a not guilty decision on the original charge and on a lesser charge in just 25 minutes. It took more time to write the charge and instructions for the jury than it took them to reach a decision.
-
Highly recommend John T Floyd law firm, great response time and demeanor.I was researching an on-going criminal case, when I found an informative article written by John Floyd (about … More the perils of expert testimony). I called his office, and was very pleased to receive a timely call back. Not only was Mr. Floyd candid and helpful, but he had the kindest demeanor of any attorney that I've dealt with. I am so glad to have found this firm.
-
Although I am not a client, John Floyd contacted me the same day I sent an email requesting advice, answered my questions and even when further to assist with my issue and communicated … More with me the next day. A true credit to his profession and I can only imagine how well he provides services to his actual clients!
-
I give Mr. Floyd 10 Stars if they were available so I'm giving him five that's all that's available. The first time I left a message for him it was on a Friday after … More 5 p.m. and within 15 minutes he called me back I told him I needed to buy a lotto ticket because that has never happened. I knew from our chat and him calling me back that he was different from any attorney I've tried to talk to left messages never got called back they didn't even know what I needed and neither did Mr. Floyd but he did call me back. I was very interested in meeting with mr. Floyd about my case because I felt he was very transparent honest and genuine. If you've ever dealt with attorneys they don't have those traits but Mr. Floyd does. He was very honest with me told me what I could and could not do with my case. He is not egotistical he's very compassionate and he actually reads the documents you sent him unbelievable that's never happened. He will be the only lawyer I refer to anyone that needs his expertise. If you're in need of a criminal defense attorney please give John T Floyd a call you will not be disappointed.
-
Mr John is a great human being and a very knowledgeable attorney. He has always called me back promptly,advised me very clearly and never rushed our conversation. i was wrongfully accused … More and Mr John had my case DISMISSED!! on the day of trial after fighting for me for two years. I am very thankful to the John T. Floyd Law Firm. You will not go wrong with John. Mr John you deserve way more then 5 stars.Thank youShaikh.
-
John Floyd Law Firm is highly recommended for your legal needs. He and his staff are highly professional in every aspect. Easy and comfortable feeling talking with him, and he understands … More your needs and explains your legal advice in a way you can understand. Enough just cant be said. Thank You Sir.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John was kind enough to assist me with legal advise on my firearm gun rights restoration. I highly recommend him and his firm. Very professional and knowledgeable. If I need assistance … More in the future I will definitely go back to him.
-
What I liked the most was that he actually returned my phone after leaving a message unlike pretty much everyone else I called prior. He listened and answered my question with the best … More advice that would benefit me the most. I was actually lost from moving to Texas from a different state we’re laws vary and he pointed me toward the right direction to get a understanding of if I need to do business with him now or after I contact a lawyer in my home state.
-
John T Floyd handled my sons case & got a dismissal for us! He is great to work with, gets back to you promptly & knows what he’s doing. Definitely one of the best we have had … More to deal with!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John is honestly the best! The whole team is. He answered me in a timely manner and helped me when my friend was going through a situation in Houston, Texas as an inmate. He was so … More thorough, honest, and without charging me sent me so much information because I was out of the loop. He never once tried to take you for your money, he did all that he could to. help me and I can't thank him enough.
-
I have used John on two occasions and found him to have full knowledge of Texas law, diligent, creative in plan, and aggressive in defense. He is the best criminal defense attorney … More in the State of Texas. No reason to look elsewhere.
-
I have been calling to get some legal advice pertaining to gun rights. A few legal offices would not even take my call because quote " your not a client and Im losing money. … More I I called John T. Floyd Law Firm and they were not only able to answer my question, but gave great detail information, and further elaborated on their answer. I hope I do not have to use them in the future, but if I do need to, they will be my first call.
-
Great lawyer! Needed some advice and gave me a Consultation, and advice for steps to take, without any hassle l, Was a honest guy and actually wanted to help me and not just take my … More money! Highly recommend!!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Attorney Floyd replied very timely to my inquiry and he provided practical advice. I will not hesitate to contact him in the future if I need additional legal counsel.
-
Highly recommend, down to earth lawyer. Talked to me about my legal issues without being super money hungry and genuinely wanted to help me with my legal problems. 5 stars ⭐️.
-
Very knowledgeable and professional. I called and left a message Friday morning and before end of business that day I received a call back.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism … More …More -
Very helpful highly recommended for any Question / case will definitely keep he's name and number for any other legal advice
-
Excellent service and a lawyer that doesn't lie. He does what he says. JW recommends him.
-
One of the best services Ive used in awhile. Thank you for all the help and answers. You got my life back. Thank youPositive
Quality …More -
Im impressed. This guy was polite and professional and most important...he listened.
-
Good experience and very good lawyer
-
-
-
Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, ValueMore -
It was a pleasure speaking with John. He is knowledgeable and has a true desire to help the people of society. I turned to him for some guidance of a long-standing issue. He never … More rushed our conversation and went out of his way to look into the details to provide the right answer as well as assist me anyway he could. Thank you for our conversations and I wish your and your firm the best. If you need a lawyer, John Floyd is your guy!
-
John represented me in court for roughly 2 years. I won't (and shouldn't) get into any serious details, but let me tell you that I couldn't have chosen anyone better. … More Seriously.Every appearance in court I felt very comfortable. The judge and DA's had a high regard for his reputation. There is a time I recall where simply his presence greatly impacted the court's interpretation of my case and persons. We were in front of the stand and the judge could not stop talking about John's prestige and past accomplishments and how that took in relation to my case. I kept silent in front of the judge, but I observed then that John's popularity and reputation within the court had already given me a better looking rapport with the judge. Let me tell you, I never had more confidence then, knowing that the judge held him in such high regard.This is not to mention how personable John is. I'll be honest that during the stress of court, sharing a laugh with your lawyer helps a lot. This may sound a lot, but I really appreciated the relationship we had then. This is also not to mention that he was able to deal very well with any DA that rotated over the years. Seriously, John was great, prompt with information and very hands on with my case. I had great peace those 2 years until everything wrapped up.If you're looking for a lawyer, I highly, HIGHLY recommend the John T. Floyd Law Firm. He IS nationally renowned, you know. He'll get the job done to the utmost confidence. He's very experienced and has a great record to boot. I am glad to have had him represent me in court and trust me that I never thought I'd ever say that (and whoever does?). We explored every avenue of victory together and I personally enjoyed the experience, despite the seriousness of the accusation.If you have a case that needs to be represented at the highest levels, choose John T. Floyd. He's a good man and very good at what he does. Him and his team has the experience you need to make the best decisions and options to get the best outcome for your case. We got the best result I could possibly ask for, thank God.Seriously. Hire John. He knows what he's doing.Seriously.
-
One of the few honest lawyers I have ever talked to. His complimentary consultation was knowledgeable and thorough. He knew exactly what the issue was and how to handle it. His candid … More appraisal of the situation and how to proceed saved me thousands of dollars in legal fees. If you have a case requiring expertise in John's area of practice, look no further. Hire this man!
-
I had the opportunity to read an article that Mr. Floyd wrote and it was very interesting. I called him about the article and advice concerning a similar situation. He not only gave … More me excellent advice, he pointed out not just what I wanted to hear but what I needed to hear concerning my situation. The Good, The Bad and The ugly in a manner or speaking. He spoke with an open and honest heart with information to help me and not just to get a client.
-
If you are in trouble and need a lawyer, contact the John T. Floyd law firm. Some of the best lawyers in Texas work there! Understanding and helpful lawyers and staff that will do all … More they can to help you 😊
-
He gave me one of the most honest answers I have received in a very long time about any issue I was having with anything. Legal or not legal. I highly recommend giving him a call and … More will be referring him to friends and family if they have any issues in the future.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He took time out of his day to answer my legal questions and didn’t even charge me. I would definitely recommend him to you.
-
Gave free consultation on getting gun rights back. He truly cares about gun rights and getting you the help you deserve. 100% worth a callPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, … More Value …More -
Very professional, great quality work, and very friendly and helpful. Overall, their service is phenomenal. I recommend Mr. Floyd to anyone.
-
Mr. Floyd took the time to explain his experience with the law to me in layman's terms. Definitely give him a call.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He was honest , knowledgeable , and professional about what we talked about. Most lawyers are just about the money , but not john.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He was very truthful and honest with us very great man I would recommend him and we would use him again
-
Very professional honest and works hard currently working my husband’s appeal I pray he does his best workPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I contacted John T. Floyd Law firm and I was very satisfied with service extremely helpful and friendly thank you Mr. FloydPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More … More -
This law frim was informative,great response time ,and the attorney called back not some secretary or legal assistant thank u guys for all your help wish it was more like youPositive … More
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I would highly recommend Mr Floyd. He was very helpful and knowledge with a legal question I had.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He explained my case better then any other lawyerPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Very informative
-
-
-
-
Had the pleasure speaking with John Floyd on a personal matter, he was very responsive, nothing but exceptional, and he really cares about you with sincerity and most importantly knows … More what is he talking about! No games or bs, his approach to my situation even though I knew it was probably way smaller then what he normally takes on, he was extremely helpful and didn't care about the size of the matter like other attorneys do. He really looked out for my best interests. You can tell he has decades of experience doing what he does just by chatting with him. I would highly recommend him.
-
Words can’t describe how grateful I am for working with John, he went above and beyond my expectation. I was wrongly accused and hired many lawyers before hiring John Floyd but they … More all disappointed me, I had lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to John. From the start he had my best interest in mind and gave helpful advice, he explained the process and guided me. He put more work and time than all my previous lawyers that cost me thousands of dollars. He was constantly communicating with court and defended me more than all lawyer i had hired before him. Don’t waste your time and money like I did, believe me when I say I hired countless lawyers before him and no one came close to John. I’m forever thankful for him for fighting for my innocence and getting my case dismissed. Thank you so much🙏🏼🙏🏼
-
I called Mr Floyd and left a message, with in the hour I received a call back with much more information then I could have ever expected. Mr Floyd was very informative on every question … More I had for him. He seemed like he cared, instead of like most attorneys that you talk to that are just out for a quick buck. If you want someone that is going to shoot strait with you, and has your best interest in hand, this is you guy. This was the best experience that I have ever had with an lawyer.
-
I can state with confidence that Mr. Floyd and his team are the most competent and professional lawyers one can hope for. My case was quite complex and I admit that as a law student … More I was not the most patient client. Mr. Floyd did a phenomenal job of managing the bench, prosecution and myself! The result was above expectation, and I will never hesitate to recommend this firm regardless of the caliber of the case at issue.
-
It was a pleasure working with Mr. Floyd. I contacted him regarding a legal matter and he was extremely knowledgeable about the law, and responded in a timely manner. I appreciated … More the fact I did not feel rushed, and he made sure he thoroughly answered all questions I had. I would highly recommend him!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
Spoke with John Floyd about a 45 year old criminal case I was involved in. I had very little information about the case and John helped me search what records were available and gave … More me guidance to find more information. He was very professional and took his time helping me. I may need to hire a lawyer on this case and Mr. Floyd will be the man.Thanks John.
-
Very professional and straight forward. He's not going to waste your time or money. Very knowledgeable in a large range of possible matters one could face living in these days … More and times. If ever you need legal assistance, this is who I would suggest. Awesome!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I called about some legal questions I needed to get clarified and John was able to give me clarification and sound advice. I will definitely contact John for all future legal questions … More and issues.Thank you John!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism, Value …More -
Knows his stuff and well respected with DA and judges. I have referred him a couple times and every client has been satisfied
-
John is beyond knowledgeable! If I decide to pursue my case any further I would only have him represent me.
-
What a great attorney, this guy really took time out of his day to answer my questions and explain my case to me. Very grateful, thank you so muchPositive
Professionalism …More -
Absolutely a very professional lawyer. Very well read in the current law and more than willing to help if needed.
-
Mr. John he’s a professional he knows what he’s doing and he’s patient they recommend Him stronglyPositive
Professionalism …More -
Great service, very knowledgable and happy to help with any questions I had
-
Quick to action and helpful and knowledgeable with entertainment industry based issues!
-
Responded on a holiday week. Very knowledgeable and reassuring.
-
Very professional
-
-
-
-
I want to thank John T. Floyd and all of his team. He is the best lawyer who cares aboutHis clients and fights really hard to get the best outcome. He is a fighter and he is awesome!!!I … More recommend if any one needs criminal defense , he is the BEST. We had a really serious caseAnd we are very thankful for the outcome. Thank you John!!!!! God bless you!!!!!!
-
The attorneys at John T. Floyd Law Firm work diligently to achieve the best possible results for their clients. They are caring and knowledgeable professionals. Their expertise in the … More law and their experience as trial attorneys makes them the right choice as a defense attorney. I recommend this law firm highly.
-
From beginning to end this firm handled my case like the top tier professionals they are. I would not trust ANYONE else with my legal needs after having less than stellar experiences … More with other teams. Thank you Floyd!!!
-
I really felt like the team cared about my case and am super satisfied with the outcome. Would not recommend anyone else!
-
These guys do amazing work and have phenomenal service! Hands down best in the Houston area!!
-
John and Chris are true professionals! Love those guys like family!
-
Mr. Floyd and his team are very knowledgeable, informative, and helpful.
-
A team you can depend on to stand up and fight for you to prove the truth the whole truth!
-
-
Mr. John T. Floyd represented me.I couldn't be happier with the outcome he managed to achieve on an VERY Important case that was dismissed the day of Trial. He is patient & … More very knowledgeable of the legal system. I HIGHLY recommend him to anyone in need of a lawyer!John, I am forever grateful & satisfied with the effort you put forth & all you did for me. Thank you isn't enough!God bless you & your family!
-
The John T. Floyd Law Firm assisted me, and I can tell you that the attorney took the time to answer my questions, and I didn't feel rushed or dismissed as I have experienced in … More the past with attorneys. The attorney was very nice and extremely knowledgeable. Initial impressions and continued excellent customer service are big factors for me and as such I would highly recommend this firm.
-
I thank you for your efforts to help Felons regain their Civil rights, and for the information on possession , I am A convicted Felon, no violent history. I am an expert shot, I am … More 76 yoa, and very concerned about the present lake of Security in our State and Country. God Bless and Prosper you in your efforts, Your friend, Sonny Bivens
-
I really appreciated both Chris and John helping with my legal questions and concerns. Both are good guys and I would not hesitate to recommend them.
-
Extremely helpful!!! Helping me understand the law.
John T. Floyd is Board Certified in Criminal Law By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Request A Confidential Consultation
Fields marked with an * are required
"*" indicates required fields
Copyright © 2024 John T. Floyd Law Firm • All rights reserved.
Designed & Developed by
