Blog
THE MINEOLA SWINGER CLUB CASE-A LEGAL NIGHTMARE
Lying Texas Ranger, Overzealous Child Advocate Experts and Pro-Prosecution Judge Mock Justice
By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
Most human tragedies are produced by random acts of Nature run amok. But far too often human tragedies are man-made, particularly in our criminal justice system. That’s what has happened in the so-called “Mineola swingers club” case. According to Michael Hall, in his latest Texas Monthly article about the case titled “Trial and Error,” this criminal justice tragedy began in 2005 when Margie Cantrell, a career “foster mom” (27 adopted children over 36 years) who either fled or migrated from California to Texas in 2004, walked into the Mineola Police Department, located in Wood County (just north of Tyler), and informed the police that two of her foster children had been forced to perform “sex shows” at the Retreat Club, a local “swingers’ club.”
Before we get into the core facts of this legal nightmare, let us set the cast of characters who have made it all possible: Judge Jack Skeen, Jr., who presides over the 241st District Court in Tyler, Smith County, Texas, and who has presided over all the criminal trials flowing out the Mineola swinger club case; Smith County District Attorney Matt Bingham who has prosecuted all the defendants thus far put to trial in the case; Sergeant Philip Kemp, the Texas Ranger and lead investigator in the case; Shauntel Mayo, Jamie Pittman, Patrick “Booger Red” Kelly, Dennis Pittman, Sheila Sones, and Jimmy Sones, the six defendants indicted in 2007 in the case.
Three of the defendants, Mayo, Pittman and Kelly, were convicted in 2008 while a fourth defendant, Dennis Pittman, was convicted last month. All were sentenced to life imprisonment, although the convictions of Shauntel Mayo and Jamie Pittman’s convictions were reversed this past June by the 14th Circuit Court of Appeals.
And, finally, there are the five alleged child sexual abuse victims whose testimony alone—without any physical evidence or adult witness corroboration—produced the four convictions in this case. The children essentially said they had been trained in a “sex kindergarten” to dress and perform in sexually provocative ways before audiences at the Retreat Club.
After Margie Cantrell’s report to the Mineola Police Department, investigators from that department, assisted by the FBI, were unable to find any evidence that supported either Cantrell’s claims based on allegations made by her foster children. Wood County Assistant D.A. Jim Wheeler told Michael Hall that the case was presented to a local grand jury and it found a “total lack of corroboration for what those kids said happened.”
Case closed, right? Nope. Cantrell was determined to transform what many in the local criminal defense bar have come to believe were child sexual fantasies transformed into reality.
But, the self-righteous “foster mom” who, along with her “foster hubby” John (who was arrested in 2005 for sexual abuse of a child in California), made nearly $110,000 during a one and one-half year period fostering three children, was undeterred by the failure of the initial investigations to produce indictments. “I called Smith County, the FBI, and Mineola police several times, as well as CPS [Child Protective Services], the Smith County CAC [Child Advocacy Center], and the Smith County police,” she claimed.
Then Texas Ranger Sergeant Philip Kemp, who gained certain notoriety for his involvement in the 2008 raid on the FLDS ranch in El Dorado and the subsequent investigation of its church members, rode to Margie Cantrell’s rescue—the same foster mom who had been decertified as a foster parent by the State of California in 2003. He employed the Ranger credo, “one riot, one Ranger,” as he took charge of the Mineola swingers’ club case. He was so generous during his videotaped interviews of the alleged child victims that he let Cantrell sit in on the sessions. As a matter of fact, the Ranger developed such a close working relationship with the foster mom that, according to Michael Hall, he let Cantrell take over the interview sessions with her own questions. Hall wrote in his latest Texas Monthly piece: “Her techniques, according to experts I spoke with who had seen tapes or read transcripts of the interviews were dubious at best. Sometimes Margie cajoled the children, petting their faces and once even kissing Sheryl’s hand. Other times she asked variations of the same questions over and over or actually suggested answers to the kids, answers they then repeated. Eventually, Sheryl, Harlan and Callie began talking about a sex kindergarten and club involving various family members and their families.”
And, of course, Ranger Kemp was aided once again by child protective services “experts” just as he had been in the FLDS case. This time it was Wood County’s Northeast Child Advocacy Center whose workers interviewed the children and reinforced their claims that they had been sexually abused. We have blogged about the dangers associated with such victim interviewing and subsequent trial testimony by these so-called “experts” (here and here).
The first two defendants to face trial were Shauntel Mayo and Jamie Pittman. The local media, and much of the national media that had paid attention to the case, had effectively demonized the couple long before they were escorted into Judge Skeen’s courtroom, where the only color, according to Hall, was an American flag behind glass on the wall.
The 64-year-old Skeen has a reputation of being pro-prosecution because of his two decades as a “law-and-order” district attorney in Smith County. “He never stopped being the DA,” attorney Thad Davidson told Hall. The judge was indeed prepared to go to extraordinary lengths to allow the prosecution to make its case against Mayo and Pittman—so much so that he made up evidentiary rules as the trial went along and improperly allowed a litany of “other crimes” evidence, all of which prompted the recent reversal of the convictions of the two defendants by the state appeals court.
The State called Sergeant Kemp, Margie Cantrell, and CPS workers to bolster the testimony of the four girls and one boy who said they had been sexually abused by family members and friends. Defense attorneys sought to show that Kemp, Cantrell, and the CPS workers had manipulated and coached the children into giving the fabricated testimony presented to the jury. “I have seen a lot and never in my wildest dreams imagined this,” one CPS worker responded before the jury. “They (the children) were preyed upon in probably one of the most heinous ways possible.”
It took the jury just four minutes to find the couple guilty, despite the fact that all of the alleged child victims gave inconsistent and contradictory testimony which was not corroborated by any other evidence. The third defendant, Patrick Kelly, at least created a little more doubt with his jury. It took his jurors less than two hours to convict him. It seemed like smooth sailing for DA Bingham and Judge Skeen until defense attorneys involved in the case learned that Texas CPS officials had withheld documents showing numerous complaints of abuse and neglect filed against the Cantrells. The case began to unravel.
Defense attorney Jason Cassel who represents Dennis Pittman had the advantage of watching the first three trials unfold, and the benefit of the appeals court ruling rebuking the legendary trial judge, before his client had to face trial. He had a firm defense strategy in mind: he was going after Margie Cantrell. Hall reported that the attorney had discovered the information about her being decertified as a foster parent in California; that she and her husband “gamed the [foster parent] system by claiming to have ‘problem’ children,” knowing it would bring more money from the state; and she had a history of intimidating and misleading her foster children, earning the moniker of “puppet master” by one of the children.
In an August 2009 Texas Monthly article, Hall reported that Cassel had created major legal and political problems in the Mineola swingers’ club case. During a series of pretrial hearings, the defense attorney produced evidence that Sergeant Kemp never visited “some of the alleged crime scenes” and violated basic “professional protocols” in witness interviewing. Even more significantly, Cassel established that Kemp lied during the first trials about two interviews he had conducted with two children on August 17, 2005. He had told defense attorneys in those cases that he didn’t “know anything about those” interviews and that he had never seen videos of the interviews. But Cassel had discovered some of Kemp’s handwritten notes made while watching a video of the interviews. At the pretrial hearing Cassel, said Hall, held up the notes and asked Kemp if it was his writing. Kemp responded it was. Cassel then informed the court that the notes referenced the August 2005 interviews. “So you watched the video from August 17, 2005 [interviews], that you denied ever watching?” Cassel asked. Kemp replied: “I must have.”
Cassel also produced at these pretrial hearings evidence that information had been withheld by Kemp or CPS officials concerning seven different interviews with the five child witnesses during which they never mentioned a “sex kindergarten” or a “sex club” and, in fact, specifically said they knew nothing about either one. Cassel also learned that there had been interviews with eight other children who also said they knew nothing about either a “sex kindergarten” or a “sex club.” This information had all been withheld from defense attorneys in the first trials.
Hall reported that DA Bingham had enough. He tried to throw in the towel on the case. Longtime and highly respected Tyler defense attorney Bobby Mims told Hall that the DA informed the Judge Skeen in the wake of the Cassel revelations that he wanted to recuse his office because of ethical implications involved with the withholding of favorable evidence. Bingham asked Attorney General Greg Abbott to take over the prosecution of Dennis Pittman. The AG refused, although his office did inform Judge Skeen that it would “assist” in the Dennis Pittman prosecution.
Perhaps Cassel’s vigorous defense and investigation of the Mineola swingers’ club case explains why Judge Skeen effectively prevented the attorney from being able to present a defense for his client. Cassel had sought to bolster his defense that the child victim’s abuse statements had been coached by Kemp, CPS workers, and Margie Cantrell in particular with testimony from experimental psychologist Marc Lindberg who is a professor at Marshall University in West Virginia. Lindberg is an expert in the study of how false memories can be suggested to young children. “If you keep asking the same questions,” Lindberg told Hall, “kids change their answers.” Cassel planned to present Margie’s videotaped interviews with the children while “Lindberg explained how her techniques could have led to false memories and answers,” Hall reported.
But if Judge Skeen had been professionally stung by the court of appeals rebuke of his handling of the Mayo/Pittman trials, he was not about to let it interfere with his determination to aid the prosecution and hamper the defense in the Dennis Pittman trial. The judge refused to let Lindberg testify. “I’ve testified all over the country,” the psychologist told Hall, “and I have never had this sort of testimony excluded.” The judge added proverbial insult to injury by ruling that Margie Cantrell did not have to answer questions from Cassel by invoking her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination; in other words, the State’s principal witness in the first three trials obviously had self-incriminating evidence to conceal about her role in the case or she was afraid of admitting perjury.
A reasonable assumption can be made that Judge Skeen penalized Cassel for the aggressive pretrial investigation he put forward in his client’s case. These two outrageous evidentiary rulings—both of which will almost certainly be reversed on appeal—are similar in nature to the same kind of rulings the judge made in the Mayo/Pittman cases. The judge certainly paved the way for the following opening remarks by Assistant DA Joe Murphy: “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the testimony you’re going to hear, summed up in two words, is pure evil.”
It proved to be an easy sale to the jury. All six defendants in the Mineola swingers’ club case had zero chance of winning a “parent of the month” award. They all resided in a local trailer park, most had criminal histories, and all had been accused of some form of meth or drug use. They have tattoos on their faces or other inappropriate places on their bodies—for example, Dennis Pittman has a “dew drop” hanging under one eye. In the piney woods of East Texas, the defendants presented the faces of “pure evil” even absent any child sexual abuse allegations.
Judge Skeen allowed Pittman’s 17-year-old stepdaughter to testify that the defendant had raped her when she was just twelve—the kind of extraneous evidence wrought with the possibility of being a false allegation. Then the children took the stand and recounted all sorts of “bad things” done to them or that they were forced to do at the swingers club. Except one little girl who sent the prosecution reeling when she said she had never “attended sex kindergarten” but admitted she had danced at the club. Hall reported the jury foreman was wiping away tears when the little boy testified and other jurors were brought to tears when one of the girl witnesses cried as she described being forced to play doctor with her brother.
“Remember why you’re here,” Murphy encouraged the jurors. “You’re here because of what [these children] went through.”
Hall reported that Cassel put up a courageous effort by showing that “the stories the children told were contradictory, inconsistent, and simply too strange to believe.” He got each child witness to admit that they had denied anyone had either inappropriately touched or sexually abused them in any way until Margie Cantrell churned the stew of “child sexual abuse” hysteria. Cassel also called adult witnesses who regularly went to the Retreat Club and never saw children there, including a police officer who regularly patrolled the club’s parking lot.
But the defense attorney’s valiant effort was not enough. In his closing, DA Bingham told jurors: “This is the children’s day. This is their day for justice.” Not even rational, everyday human logic can offset that kind of emotional appeal. But Cassel tried anyway, telling jurors: “[Think about] a sex club across the street from the Mineola newspaper at a busy, busy intersection and a nursing home in a residential neighborhood off Highway 80 with … the police patrolling the parking lot, people installing cable, strangers able to gain entry by knocking on the door. Does it make sense?”
It apparently made sense in East Texas where political and social conservatism dominate everyday life in counties like Smith County. One local defense attorney told Michael Hall: “I suspect those jurors made up their minds during jury selection.” It certainly did not take them long to reach a unanimous “guilty” verdict—just 90 minutes. Judge Skeen then instructed them to return to deliberate the punishment. It took them only twenty minutes to return with a “life sentence” verdict. Hall reported that Margie and John Cantrell, along with their eight foster children, were in the courtroom to celebrate the moment of victory.
Hall also reported that before Judge Skeen sent the jurors back into their regular lives he gave them a four-minute speech about the “wonder of the American justice system.” He informed them, in a down home Texas drawl, that “there has been a real, a very deep price paid for us to be in this courtroom” by other men and women who have paid the ultimate price for our system of justice, At that point, Hall wrote, the judge’s voice “cracked” and “with difficulty” he managed to conclude: “It’s one we always want to keep, and it’s provided by people like you who pull the heavy wagon, share the burden, and make the tough decisions.” He finished the emotional discharge by telling jurors that the American flag which hangs in his courtroom “formerly flew at ground zero, where the Twin Towers once stood.”
What possible chance did “dew drop” Pittman have in that kind of judicial setting? Not very much. And Hall, who has as much or more knowledge about the “Mineola swingers club” case as anyone, said he fully expects the same verdict in the remaining two cases “largely because [they] will be overseen by the same judge.” Attorney Mims confirmed as much, telling the Texas Monthly contributor: “Due process demands that the defense gets to put on a case. Cassel was prevented from doing that. Don’t get me wrong. Judge Skeen is a great guy.
I love him. He’s one of my best friends. But he’s been a terrible judge on these cases … Cassel proved that what those children said happened could not have happened. They were never in that swingers club. The problem is that juries don’t always make decisions based on logic. In this type of case they make them on their hearts or fear. That’s a hazard of a jury system. Still, they should have all the evidence. If they then decide the defendant’s guilty, that’s fine. But in these cases I don’t think they would have. I believe these people are innocent.”
We don’t have the same “friendship” point of view about Judge Skeen as attorney Mims. Our point of view is that the judge very methodically and deliberately engaged in the same kind of evidentiary decision-making in Dennis Pittman’s trial that was so roundly rebuked by the appeals court in the Shauntel Mayo and Jamie Pittman cases—and as Hall pointed out, the only reason the appeals court did not reverse Patrick Kelly’s conviction is because his attorney did not raise those evidentiary issues on appeal.
We also believe in the same justice system that Judge Skeen praised to jurors in the Dennis Pittman case. And that’s why we believe that same system will inevitably reverse the judge once again on appeal. Thankfully the appeals court system exists to protect criminal defendants from judges who get so emotionally and personally involved in cases that they deny those defendants the fundamental opportunity to present a defense. Cassel had a good defense prepared: evidence about Margie Cantrell’s abuses of the “foster parent” system and her propensity for manipulating her own foster children. Marc Lindberg would have given jurors a chance to see the “whole picture” in the Mineola swingers club case—not just the children’s coached testimony based on fabricated stories elicited by Sergeant Kemp, Margie Cantrell, and a host of those “child advocate” experts.
Mark this warning: the Mineola swingers’ club case has the same earmarks as the infamous California “McMartin preschool” child sexual abuse case in the 1980s which ultimately unraveled in the 1990s. DA Bingham faces not only two more untried defendants but must decide whether to retry Mayo and Pittman—and before all is said and done, he will face decisions about whether to retry Patrick Kelly and Dennis Pittman as well because their convictions will also be reversed. Judge Skeen has guaranteed as much. The Mineola swingers’ club case began and evolved through the imaginations of Margie and John Cantrell, both of whom have proven to be irresponsible “foster parents” who have suckled off the state for decades while abusing foster children in the process. And these “career foster parents” had a lot of help in creating this legal nightmare from a lying Texas Ranger and overzealous “child advocate” experts who somehow always manage to weasel their way into the wrong side of major child sexual abuse cases that capture massive media exposure, like the FLDS case.
While the “Mineola swingers club” case is an injustice for the indicted defendants and their attorneys, it will ultimately prove to be a “mud in the eye” case for the officials and jurors in Smith County, Texas.
By:Houston Criminal AttorneyJohn Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
Take the first step toward protecting your freedom by contacting us now
Testimonials
John T. Floyd Law Firm
3730 Kirby Drive # 750, Houston
-
If you have hired attorneys that meet the Webster dictionary definition, ie: "Attorney " is a person that has a law degree, will not be totally honest, can take your money … More and not earn it, will put you off until he is ready to talk to you, and/or never study your case to be able to defend you. Mr. Floyd is the only attorney that doesn't fit that definition!! You will be delighted to have Mr. John Floyd in your corner! Not one attorney that I have ever met that would ever return a check that I sent to him, because he said I paid him too much! Wow! That right there should tell you something about his integrity!!!!! He has a very calm demeanor and doesn't stretch the truth even if you don't want to hear it, he will tell you the truth. Call and set up an appointment with him and judge for yourself. You are wasting time and money on any other attorney, just hire the best, Mr. Floyd.
-
John T. Floyd and his team are some of the best people! I was able to get a second opinion from them on legal advice. His team has been honest, kind, and very informative which has … More been a huge blesssing.
-
I highly recommend John T. Floyd Lawfirm. They are truly knowledgeable and willing to go the extra mile to defend your innocence. Psalms 35
-
Outstanding!Professional knowledge. Rich experiences. Good outcome.
-
-
The best lawyer I ever encounter with a very good personality. He’s very professional and he will go far and beyond for his clients best interest. He’s definitely a 5 star attorney … More when it comes to delivering. I couldn’t be more happier that I hired him !! 👏👏👏👏
-
-
I can honestly say from what I have seen so far, Floyd is a compassionate soul who cares for his client's. Floyd is by far very knowledgeable in this area. He's currently … More assisting my [Father] on a sex assault. We are all suffering so much as my father is an elder man, but we have faith in God, and Mr. Floyd he can dismissed this outrageous allegation soon. Thank you, yoli
-
I had wonderful experience with this law firm. They were so helpful and knowledgeable of the process.my case was dismissed because of Mr John T Floyd,thank you for everything .
-
I am very happy today my case dismissed God bless Mr John T Floyd very good lawyer thanks you so mush sir
-
I had a great experience with this Law Firm, the kind staff helped me locate a Lawyer even though they were unable to take my case.
They were very helpful, kind and returned my call … More in a timely manner. I would definitely recommend them and use them in the future. -
I can tell that Jone is an excellent attorney in Houston. Personally, he is a great man. In addition to great service and amazing results. Recommended
-
Mr. Floyd is an incredible attorney and human being. He cares about your case, the facts, the law, and your life! I am sorry for whatever situation you are going through, but choosing … More Mr. Floyd, his firm, and their professional experience to help you, will be the best decision you ever make!
-
John T Floyd is a straight shooter! He was very direct and responsive to my phone calls and questions. I was in awe of his knowledge, and professional decorum! The best decision that … More you could make is to schedule a consultation with him before considering anyone else!
-
I asked the Law Office of John T. Floyd a very important question regarding the legal aspects of purchasing a firearm with a deferred adjudication charge. They answered the question … More very professionally and accurately and I was quite pleased with the information that was shared. I recommend this law firm because they are very honest and will work for you and with you.
-
I’ve never been one to write reviews but this time I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to say something. I had some serious legal questions I needed answers to concerning Texas laws. … More Being I’m from another state, I found and reached out to Attorney John Floyd for the answers. Mr Floyd listened to to my requests and told me what he need from me and went out of his way to get me the answers. Very polite, straightforward and professional, I can’t thank him enough for all he’s done. Whatever your legal case may be, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Mr Floyd.
-
John & Chris helped my family member get a reduced charge and acceptable plea agreement in place. Their compassion, attention to every detail was what helped carry the day.Truly … More the best of the best.P
-
Mr. Floyd is both ethical and loyal to his clients; two qualities that are hard to find specially in lawyers. I'd definitely recommend him to anyone.Positive
Professionalism …More … More -
Mr. John was very helpful and truly was the reason why my case was dismissed. Thank you so much Mr. John I truly recommend everyone in need to work with him.
-
His service to the community and diligence to helping his clients speaks for its self! Not to mention the many articles, papers and TV appearances that speak to his intellect
-
John has given Excellent service and have been very friendly and extremely helpful to us. I highly recommend this law firm
-
This law firm is diligent, responsive and succeeded in getting my case dismissed. 10/10 would recommend.
-
super knowledgeable, good attitude, would definitely recommend him
-
Very helpful, knowledgeable and honest.
-
John is an amazing person and lawyer who is actually very understanding of how anxious I got and although it was hard to reach him sometimes because of his schedule, but never worry … More he is on top of things. He is very organized, very smart. I had the experience to go through a trial with him, and he always plans ahead well and is actually open and receptive to any ideas and comments I had and he was quick to decide which is right to use at the moment. I really appreciated working with him and Chris. Great lawyers and great people. As I was reminded by John, I am adding that the Jury reached a not guilty decision on the original charge and on a lesser charge in just 25 minutes. It took more time to write the charge and instructions for the jury than it took them to reach a decision.
-
Highly recommend John T Floyd law firm, great response time and demeanor.I was researching an on-going criminal case, when I found an informative article written by John Floyd (about … More the perils of expert testimony). I called his office, and was very pleased to receive a timely call back. Not only was Mr. Floyd candid and helpful, but he had the kindest demeanor of any attorney that I've dealt with. I am so glad to have found this firm.
-
Although I am not a client, John Floyd contacted me the same day I sent an email requesting advice, answered my questions and even when further to assist with my issue and communicated … More with me the next day. A true credit to his profession and I can only imagine how well he provides services to his actual clients!
-
I give Mr. Floyd 10 Stars if they were available so I'm giving him five that's all that's available. The first time I left a message for him it was on a Friday after … More 5 p.m. and within 15 minutes he called me back I told him I needed to buy a lotto ticket because that has never happened. I knew from our chat and him calling me back that he was different from any attorney I've tried to talk to left messages never got called back they didn't even know what I needed and neither did Mr. Floyd but he did call me back. I was very interested in meeting with mr. Floyd about my case because I felt he was very transparent honest and genuine. If you've ever dealt with attorneys they don't have those traits but Mr. Floyd does. He was very honest with me told me what I could and could not do with my case. He is not egotistical he's very compassionate and he actually reads the documents you sent him unbelievable that's never happened. He will be the only lawyer I refer to anyone that needs his expertise. If you're in need of a criminal defense attorney please give John T Floyd a call you will not be disappointed.
-
Mr John is a great human being and a very knowledgeable attorney. He has always called me back promptly,advised me very clearly and never rushed our conversation. i was wrongfully accused … More and Mr John had my case DISMISSED!! on the day of trial after fighting for me for two years. I am very thankful to the John T. Floyd Law Firm. You will not go wrong with John. Mr John you deserve way more then 5 stars.Thank youShaikh.
-
John Floyd Law Firm is highly recommended for your legal needs. He and his staff are highly professional in every aspect. Easy and comfortable feeling talking with him, and he understands … More your needs and explains your legal advice in a way you can understand. Enough just cant be said. Thank You Sir.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John was kind enough to assist me with legal advise on my firearm gun rights restoration. I highly recommend him and his firm. Very professional and knowledgeable. If I need assistance … More in the future I will definitely go back to him.
-
What I liked the most was that he actually returned my phone after leaving a message unlike pretty much everyone else I called prior. He listened and answered my question with the best … More advice that would benefit me the most. I was actually lost from moving to Texas from a different state we’re laws vary and he pointed me toward the right direction to get a understanding of if I need to do business with him now or after I contact a lawyer in my home state.
-
John T Floyd handled my sons case & got a dismissal for us! He is great to work with, gets back to you promptly & knows what he’s doing. Definitely one of the best we have had … More to deal with!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John is honestly the best! The whole team is. He answered me in a timely manner and helped me when my friend was going through a situation in Houston, Texas as an inmate. He was so … More thorough, honest, and without charging me sent me so much information because I was out of the loop. He never once tried to take you for your money, he did all that he could to. help me and I can't thank him enough.
-
I have used John on two occasions and found him to have full knowledge of Texas law, diligent, creative in plan, and aggressive in defense. He is the best criminal defense attorney … More in the State of Texas. No reason to look elsewhere.
-
I have been calling to get some legal advice pertaining to gun rights. A few legal offices would not even take my call because quote " your not a client and Im losing money. … More I I called John T. Floyd Law Firm and they were not only able to answer my question, but gave great detail information, and further elaborated on their answer. I hope I do not have to use them in the future, but if I do need to, they will be my first call.
-
Great lawyer! Needed some advice and gave me a Consultation, and advice for steps to take, without any hassle l, Was a honest guy and actually wanted to help me and not just take my … More money! Highly recommend!!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Attorney Floyd replied very timely to my inquiry and he provided practical advice. I will not hesitate to contact him in the future if I need additional legal counsel.
-
Highly recommend, down to earth lawyer. Talked to me about my legal issues without being super money hungry and genuinely wanted to help me with my legal problems. 5 stars ⭐️.
-
Very knowledgeable and professional. I called and left a message Friday morning and before end of business that day I received a call back.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism … More …More -
Very helpful highly recommended for any Question / case will definitely keep he's name and number for any other legal advice
-
Excellent service and a lawyer that doesn't lie. He does what he says. JW recommends him.
-
One of the best services Ive used in awhile. Thank you for all the help and answers. You got my life back. Thank youPositive
Quality …More -
Im impressed. This guy was polite and professional and most important...he listened.
-
Good experience and very good lawyer
-
-
-
Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, ValueMore -
It was a pleasure speaking with John. He is knowledgeable and has a true desire to help the people of society. I turned to him for some guidance of a long-standing issue. He never … More rushed our conversation and went out of his way to look into the details to provide the right answer as well as assist me anyway he could. Thank you for our conversations and I wish your and your firm the best. If you need a lawyer, John Floyd is your guy!
-
John represented me in court for roughly 2 years. I won't (and shouldn't) get into any serious details, but let me tell you that I couldn't have chosen anyone better. … More Seriously.Every appearance in court I felt very comfortable. The judge and DA's had a high regard for his reputation. There is a time I recall where simply his presence greatly impacted the court's interpretation of my case and persons. We were in front of the stand and the judge could not stop talking about John's prestige and past accomplishments and how that took in relation to my case. I kept silent in front of the judge, but I observed then that John's popularity and reputation within the court had already given me a better looking rapport with the judge. Let me tell you, I never had more confidence then, knowing that the judge held him in such high regard.This is not to mention how personable John is. I'll be honest that during the stress of court, sharing a laugh with your lawyer helps a lot. This may sound a lot, but I really appreciated the relationship we had then. This is also not to mention that he was able to deal very well with any DA that rotated over the years. Seriously, John was great, prompt with information and very hands on with my case. I had great peace those 2 years until everything wrapped up.If you're looking for a lawyer, I highly, HIGHLY recommend the John T. Floyd Law Firm. He IS nationally renowned, you know. He'll get the job done to the utmost confidence. He's very experienced and has a great record to boot. I am glad to have had him represent me in court and trust me that I never thought I'd ever say that (and whoever does?). We explored every avenue of victory together and I personally enjoyed the experience, despite the seriousness of the accusation.If you have a case that needs to be represented at the highest levels, choose John T. Floyd. He's a good man and very good at what he does. Him and his team has the experience you need to make the best decisions and options to get the best outcome for your case. We got the best result I could possibly ask for, thank God.Seriously. Hire John. He knows what he's doing.Seriously.
-
One of the few honest lawyers I have ever talked to. His complimentary consultation was knowledgeable and thorough. He knew exactly what the issue was and how to handle it. His candid … More appraisal of the situation and how to proceed saved me thousands of dollars in legal fees. If you have a case requiring expertise in John's area of practice, look no further. Hire this man!
-
I had the opportunity to read an article that Mr. Floyd wrote and it was very interesting. I called him about the article and advice concerning a similar situation. He not only gave … More me excellent advice, he pointed out not just what I wanted to hear but what I needed to hear concerning my situation. The Good, The Bad and The ugly in a manner or speaking. He spoke with an open and honest heart with information to help me and not just to get a client.
-
If you are in trouble and need a lawyer, contact the John T. Floyd law firm. Some of the best lawyers in Texas work there! Understanding and helpful lawyers and staff that will do all … More they can to help you 😊
-
He gave me one of the most honest answers I have received in a very long time about any issue I was having with anything. Legal or not legal. I highly recommend giving him a call and … More will be referring him to friends and family if they have any issues in the future.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He took time out of his day to answer my legal questions and didn’t even charge me. I would definitely recommend him to you.
-
Gave free consultation on getting gun rights back. He truly cares about gun rights and getting you the help you deserve. 100% worth a callPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, … More Value …More -
Very professional, great quality work, and very friendly and helpful. Overall, their service is phenomenal. I recommend Mr. Floyd to anyone.
-
Mr. Floyd took the time to explain his experience with the law to me in layman's terms. Definitely give him a call.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He was honest , knowledgeable , and professional about what we talked about. Most lawyers are just about the money , but not john.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He was very truthful and honest with us very great man I would recommend him and we would use him again
-
Very professional honest and works hard currently working my husband’s appeal I pray he does his best workPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I contacted John T. Floyd Law firm and I was very satisfied with service extremely helpful and friendly thank you Mr. FloydPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More … More -
This law frim was informative,great response time ,and the attorney called back not some secretary or legal assistant thank u guys for all your help wish it was more like youPositive … More
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I would highly recommend Mr Floyd. He was very helpful and knowledge with a legal question I had.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He explained my case better then any other lawyerPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Very informative
-
-
-
-
Had the pleasure speaking with John Floyd on a personal matter, he was very responsive, nothing but exceptional, and he really cares about you with sincerity and most importantly knows … More what is he talking about! No games or bs, his approach to my situation even though I knew it was probably way smaller then what he normally takes on, he was extremely helpful and didn't care about the size of the matter like other attorneys do. He really looked out for my best interests. You can tell he has decades of experience doing what he does just by chatting with him. I would highly recommend him.
-
Words can’t describe how grateful I am for working with John, he went above and beyond my expectation. I was wrongly accused and hired many lawyers before hiring John Floyd but they … More all disappointed me, I had lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to John. From the start he had my best interest in mind and gave helpful advice, he explained the process and guided me. He put more work and time than all my previous lawyers that cost me thousands of dollars. He was constantly communicating with court and defended me more than all lawyer i had hired before him. Don’t waste your time and money like I did, believe me when I say I hired countless lawyers before him and no one came close to John. I’m forever thankful for him for fighting for my innocence and getting my case dismissed. Thank you so much🙏🏼🙏🏼
-
I called Mr Floyd and left a message, with in the hour I received a call back with much more information then I could have ever expected. Mr Floyd was very informative on every question … More I had for him. He seemed like he cared, instead of like most attorneys that you talk to that are just out for a quick buck. If you want someone that is going to shoot strait with you, and has your best interest in hand, this is you guy. This was the best experience that I have ever had with an lawyer.
-
I can state with confidence that Mr. Floyd and his team are the most competent and professional lawyers one can hope for. My case was quite complex and I admit that as a law student … More I was not the most patient client. Mr. Floyd did a phenomenal job of managing the bench, prosecution and myself! The result was above expectation, and I will never hesitate to recommend this firm regardless of the caliber of the case at issue.
-
It was a pleasure working with Mr. Floyd. I contacted him regarding a legal matter and he was extremely knowledgeable about the law, and responded in a timely manner. I appreciated … More the fact I did not feel rushed, and he made sure he thoroughly answered all questions I had. I would highly recommend him!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
Spoke with John Floyd about a 45 year old criminal case I was involved in. I had very little information about the case and John helped me search what records were available and gave … More me guidance to find more information. He was very professional and took his time helping me. I may need to hire a lawyer on this case and Mr. Floyd will be the man.Thanks John.
-
Very professional and straight forward. He's not going to waste your time or money. Very knowledgeable in a large range of possible matters one could face living in these days … More and times. If ever you need legal assistance, this is who I would suggest. Awesome!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I called about some legal questions I needed to get clarified and John was able to give me clarification and sound advice. I will definitely contact John for all future legal questions … More and issues.Thank you John!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism, Value …More -
Knows his stuff and well respected with DA and judges. I have referred him a couple times and every client has been satisfied
-
John is beyond knowledgeable! If I decide to pursue my case any further I would only have him represent me.
-
What a great attorney, this guy really took time out of his day to answer my questions and explain my case to me. Very grateful, thank you so muchPositive
Professionalism …More -
Absolutely a very professional lawyer. Very well read in the current law and more than willing to help if needed.
-
Mr. John he’s a professional he knows what he’s doing and he’s patient they recommend Him stronglyPositive
Professionalism …More -
Great service, very knowledgable and happy to help with any questions I had
-
Quick to action and helpful and knowledgeable with entertainment industry based issues!
-
Responded on a holiday week. Very knowledgeable and reassuring.
-
Very professional
-
-
-
-
I want to thank John T. Floyd and all of his team. He is the best lawyer who cares aboutHis clients and fights really hard to get the best outcome. He is a fighter and he is awesome!!!I … More recommend if any one needs criminal defense , he is the BEST. We had a really serious caseAnd we are very thankful for the outcome. Thank you John!!!!! God bless you!!!!!!
-
The attorneys at John T. Floyd Law Firm work diligently to achieve the best possible results for their clients. They are caring and knowledgeable professionals. Their expertise in the … More law and their experience as trial attorneys makes them the right choice as a defense attorney. I recommend this law firm highly.
-
From beginning to end this firm handled my case like the top tier professionals they are. I would not trust ANYONE else with my legal needs after having less than stellar experiences … More with other teams. Thank you Floyd!!!
-
I really felt like the team cared about my case and am super satisfied with the outcome. Would not recommend anyone else!
-
These guys do amazing work and have phenomenal service! Hands down best in the Houston area!!
-
John and Chris are true professionals! Love those guys like family!
-
Mr. Floyd and his team are very knowledgeable, informative, and helpful.
-
A team you can depend on to stand up and fight for you to prove the truth the whole truth!
-
-
Mr. John T. Floyd represented me.I couldn't be happier with the outcome he managed to achieve on an VERY Important case that was dismissed the day of Trial. He is patient & … More very knowledgeable of the legal system. I HIGHLY recommend him to anyone in need of a lawyer!John, I am forever grateful & satisfied with the effort you put forth & all you did for me. Thank you isn't enough!God bless you & your family!
-
The John T. Floyd Law Firm assisted me, and I can tell you that the attorney took the time to answer my questions, and I didn't feel rushed or dismissed as I have experienced in … More the past with attorneys. The attorney was very nice and extremely knowledgeable. Initial impressions and continued excellent customer service are big factors for me and as such I would highly recommend this firm.
-
I thank you for your efforts to help Felons regain their Civil rights, and for the information on possession , I am A convicted Felon, no violent history. I am an expert shot, I am … More 76 yoa, and very concerned about the present lake of Security in our State and Country. God Bless and Prosper you in your efforts, Your friend, Sonny Bivens
-
I really appreciated both Chris and John helping with my legal questions and concerns. Both are good guys and I would not hesitate to recommend them.
-
Extremely helpful!!! Helping me understand the law.
John T. Floyd is Board Certified in Criminal Law By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Request A Confidential Consultation
Fields marked with an * are required
"*" indicates required fields
Copyright © 2024 John T. Floyd Law Firm • All rights reserved.
Designed & Developed by
