Blog
EXTRANEOUS OFFENSE EVIDENCE:ERODING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT’S GUARANTEE OF A FAIR TRIAL
By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and paralegal Billy Sinclair
Common law has long recognized the fundamental principle that an accused is entitled to be tried solely on the criminal charge leveled against him by the State; that he should not have to simultaneously defend against other alleged criminal activity or for being a criminal in generally. In 1948, the U.S. Supreme Court observed that “[c]ourts that follow the common-law tradition almost unanimously have come to disallow resort by the prosecution to any kind of evidence of a defendant’s evil character to establish a probability of his guilt.”
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) in 1972 severely undermined this Supreme Court instruction by reinforcing its view that evidence of “other crimes” committed by a defendant may be admitted against him at trial when that highly prejudicial evidence is shown to be material and relevant to a “contested issue in the case;” put simply, when its probative value outweighs it prejudicial impact. The CCA, in Albrecht v. State, however, cautioned that “before evidence of collateral crimes is admissible, a relationship between such evidence and the evidence necessary to prove that the accused committed the crime for which he stands charged must be shown. The CCA then set forth the six circumstances that justify the admission of extraneous offense evidence:
- To show the context in which the criminal act occurred – what has been termed the “res gestae” – under the reasoning that events do not occur in a vacuum and that the jury has a right to hear what occurred immediately prior to and subsequent to the commission of that act so that they may realistically evaluate the evidence.
- To circumstantially prove identity where the state lacks direct evidence on this issue.
- To prove scienter, where intent or guilty knowledge is an essential element of the state’s case and cannot be inferred from the act itself.
- To prove malice or state of mind, when malice is an essential element of the state’s case and cannot be inferred from the criminal act.
- To show the accused’s motive, particularly where the commission of the offense at bar is either conditioned upon the commission of the extraneous offense or is part of a continuing plan or scheme of which the crime on trial is also a part.
- To refute a defense theory raised by the accused.
Put simply, underAlbrecht, the State could use extraneous offense evidence any time it had a weak case on the charged offense and, thus, could tip the scale in its favor by allowing the jury to infer that because the defendantmayhave committed another criminal act, it is more likely than not that he committed the charged offense.
Nearly fifteen years afterAlbrechtthe Texas Rules of Evidence were adopted, and Rule 404(b) codified the circumstances under which other crimes, wrongs or acts may be admissible, stating: “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, provided that upon timely request by the accused in a criminal case, reasonable notice is given in advance of trial of intent to introduce in the State’s case-in-chief such evidence other than that arising in the same transaction.”
In other words, when the State does not have sufficient direct or circumstantial evidence to prove the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt, it can utilize highly prejudicial extraneous offense evidence to allow the jury to infer that the defendant is an “evil character.” The Rules, however, do provide some safeguards against unfettered use of extraneous offense evidence.
Before such evidence can be admitted, the trial judge under Rule 403 may exclude the evidence through a cost/benefit analysis “if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
In 2006, the CCA in Gigliobianco v. State defined the five “key phrases” in Rule 403:
- “Probative value” – the inherent force of a piece of evidence that serves to make more or less probable the existence of a fact of consequence to the litigation and a proponent’s need for the evidence.
- “Unfair prejudice” – a tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis, commonly, though not necessarily, an emotional one, such as evidence that arouses the jury’s hostility or sympathy for one side without regard to the logical probative force of the evidence.
- “Confusion of the issues” – evidence that tends to confuse or distract the jury from the main issues of the case, particularly evidence that consumes an inordinate amount of time to either present or refute.
- “Misleading the jury” – evidence that tends to be given undue weight by the jury on other emotional grounds, e.g., “scientific” evidence the jury does not sufficiently understand.
- “Undue delay” and “needless presentation of cumulative evidence” – both concern the efficiency of the trial proceeding rather than the threat of an inaccurate decision.
Armed with these clearly defined phrases, the trial court when considering Rule 404(b) evidencemustbalance:
- The inherent probative force of the proffered items of evidence along with
- the proponent’s need for that evidence against
- any tendency of the evidence to suggest decision on an improper basis,
- any tendency of the evidence to confuse or distract the jury from the main issues,
- any tendency of the evidence to be given undue weight by a jury that has not been equipped to evaluate the probative force of the evidence, and
- the likelihood that presentation of the evidence will consume an inordinate amount of time or merely repeat evidence already admitted.
There are two kinds of extraneous offense evidence: same transaction contextual evidence and background contextual evidence. Same transaction evidence is admissible as an exception to Rule 404(b)’s “propensity rule”—evidence tending to show bad character—when the defendant is charged with several crimes or with offenses so connected that one of them cannot be shown without the other. Background evidence, on the other hand, are “facts that do not bear directly on the purely legal issues, but merely fill in the background of the narrative and give it interest, color, and lifelikeness.” In the extraneous offense context, background evidence would be acts of misconduct by the defendant which are not necessary to prove the charged offense and “are not exempt under Rule 404(b) from the general prohibition of the admission of character or propensity evidence against the accused.” The most frequent challenge to background evidence is that it is offered only to show the accused as a “bad character.” The challenge is made because if the trial court finds a factual basis in the challenge, it has no discretion and must refuse to admit the evidence.
However, if the trial judge rules that the background evidence is admissible, he/she is under no legal duty to explain that decision—and on appeal the judge’s decision will be reviewed under the “abuse of discretion standard;” namely, a decision to admit or exclude evidence presents nothing to review absent a clear showing by the defendant that one of his substantial rights was violated (a substantial right violation is found only when it has an “injurious affect” on the jury’s verdict).
The latest case handed down by the CCA concerning extraneous offense evidence was last December in Devoe v. State, and it deals with both same transaction and background evidence. There is little doubt that Paul Devoe fits the definition of a “bad” character as envisioned by the Supreme Court in 1948. In fact, one can easily surmise Devoe’s character was nothing short of evil. He was convicted, and sentenced to death, in 2009 for the murders of Haylie Faulkner and Danielle Hensley during the “same criminal transaction.” The following evidence was presented during the guilt/innocence and punishment phases of Devoe’s trial:
- In august 2007 Devoe stole a Jennings .380-caliber handgun from a friend named Bill Brinlee.
- On August 24, 2007 Devoe was living in the Llano home of Sharon Wilson in exchange for work he agreed to do around the house. She told Devoe that she did not allow weapons in her home. A short time later she found Devoe looking in her purse. She told him to leave her home. Before leaving he pointed the weapon at Wilson’s head and midsection before turning away and firing the weapon into the living room couch several times. Devoe stole Wilson’s Dodge Dakota pickup truck as well as the money and credit cards she had in her purse.
- In the evening of August 24 Devoe went to O’Neill’s Sports Tavern where his estranged girlfriend, Glenda Purcell, frequented. He was dressed in his “motorcycle attire”—black leather vest, chaps, a cap, and a jacket. Devoe walked over to where Purcell was sitting, put his hand over her eyes, and placed the gun against her head. He pulled the trigger several times but the weapon jammed. Mike Allred, a friend of Purcell, tried to persuade Devoe to put down the gun at which time Devoe shot him in the chest severing the victim’s aorta. Devoe fled in the Dakota pickup as Allred bled to death.
- Devoe went to Jonestown where Paula Griffith lived with her 15-year-old daughter, Haylie Faulkner. Devoe had previously had a romantic relationship with Griffith. On this August 24th evening Griffith, Haylie, and Haylie’s friend, Danielle Hensley, and Griffith’s boyfriend, Jay Feltner, were at the Griffith home preparing for a trip to the Fiesta Texas amusement park near San Antonio. On Sunday morning, August 26, the Jonestown police entered the Griffith residence where they found Feltner who had been shot in the back of the head at the kitchen table; Griffith was also shot in the back of the head as she tried to flee from the kitchen into living room; Haylie was on the living room floor with a bullet wound to the head; and Hensley lay on the living room sofa with four bullet wounds, one to the head. The police found Wilson’s Dakota pickup parked in Griffith front yard and Griffith’s Saturn station wagon missing. Feltner’s cell phone was also missing.
- In the evening of August 24, a Friday, Devoe called his friend Brinlee and told him that he had tried to kill Purcell but Allred had gotten in the way.
- Feltner’s cell phone records showed that his cell phone had been used Friday evening, the 24th, Saturday, the 25th, and Sunday, the 26th, in Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. Police theorized Devoe was heading to his mother’s home in Shirley, New York.
- On August 26, while driving through Pennsylvania, Devoe began having motor trouble with Griffith’s vehicle. He pulled off the Interstate where he saw a “nice car” parked in the driveway of a home in Greencastle. He stole Betty Diehart’s 2006 Hyundai Elantra. Diehart was found lying on her bed in with a bullet wound to the head. Police found a ton of incriminating evidence in the Diehart residence linking Devoe to the Texas killings.
- On Monday, August 27, Devoe was arrested at the home of a friend and former employer, Gerald Baldoni, and more evidence linking him to the Texas killings was discovered during a search of his person and belongings.
Before this horrific killing spree, Devoe had accumulated an extensive criminal history. He had been confined more than 20 times in New York for misdemeanors; was incarcerated in Texas for various misdemeanors; and spent five years in prison. His offenses included aggravated unlicensed operation of a vehicle, aggravated harassment, criminal trespass, disorderly conduct, endangering the welfare of a child; and he was convicted twice for harassment, three times for assault, and four times for DUI. In addition to these criminal offenses, Devoe had a “lengthy history of abusing women.”
The jury heard all this evidence, including testimony from “numerous witnesses” that Devoe abused alcohol and drugs which caused him to be more violent, during both the guilt/innocence and punishment phases of the trial. Pursuant to Rule 404(b), the State presented evidence at the guilt phase pertaining to the theft of Brinlee’s gun, the aggravated assault of Wilson, the killing of Allred, and the robbery of Diehart in Pennsylvania. While Devoe objected to this background evidence, he conceded that the murders of Griffith and Feltner was admissible as same transaction evidence.
At a pre-trial Rule 403 hearing, the State argued that the charged offenses and the extraneous offenses were part of a single “crime spree.” The State contended the crime spree began with the burglary of Brinlee’s residence and theft of his gun and culminated with the robbery of Diehart. The State argued that since it had no direct evidence that Devoe committed the Jonestown murders, the extraneous evidence was necessary to “explain what happened in Jonestown.” In effect, background evidence was needed to tie Devoe to the charged murders; namely, the same transactional murders of Faulkner, Hemsley, Feltner and Griffith. The trial court agreed, saying the absence of the background evidence would leave a gaping hole in the State’s case.
Devoe, on the other hand, argued that since he was not “challenging the State’s version of the events,” the background evidence was unnecessary to prove identity or any of the other Rule 404(b) exceptions. The CCA found this argument unpersuasive, saying: “Appellant did not plead guilty, and he argued at closing against a finding of guilt. When the identity of the perpetrator can be established by circumstantial evidence only, identity is a contested issue even if the defense rests with the State, puts on no evidence, and raises no defensive theories … We also note that this argument is without merit because, aside from the identity issue, the State needed all of this evidence to give context to [Devoe’s] crime spree as he stole the gun to go after women with whom he had had personal relationships and then to effectuate his flight to his mother’s home.”
We believe there was sufficient independent physical evidence apart from the background evidence to convict Devoe of the same transaction Jonestown crimes. There was DNA evidence linking Devoe to the crime, ballistics matches from the bullets recovered from the murder scene to the weapon in his possession at the time of arrest, the use of Feltner cell phone in Pennsylvania, and the abandonment of Griffith Saturn station wagon in Greencastle, Pennsylvania. Thus, we believe the background evidence was presented for no other reason than to show Devoe as an “evil characters” on a wanton “crime spree.” But bad facts do make bad law…
The use of extraneous offense/bad act evidence is incredibly prejudicial to any defendant sitting before a jury charged with a criminal offense. It is therefore approaching malpractice for a criminal defense attorney to fail to request notice of all 404(b) evidence in advance of every trial. It is only with such notice from the State that the lawyer can be prepared to argue against the admissibility of the extraneous evidence and be prepared to contest the allegations should they be allowed in trial.
By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and paralegal Billy Sinclair
John Floyd is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Take the first step toward protecting your freedom by contacting us now
Testimonials
John T. Floyd Law Firm
3730 Kirby Drive # 750, Houston
-
If you have hired attorneys that meet the Webster dictionary definition, ie: "Attorney " is a person that has a law degree, will not be totally honest, can take your money … More and not earn it, will put you off until he is ready to talk to you, and/or never study your case to be able to defend you. Mr. Floyd is the only attorney that doesn't fit that definition!! You will be delighted to have Mr. John Floyd in your corner! Not one attorney that I have ever met that would ever return a check that I sent to him, because he said I paid him too much! Wow! That right there should tell you something about his integrity!!!!! He has a very calm demeanor and doesn't stretch the truth even if you don't want to hear it, he will tell you the truth. Call and set up an appointment with him and judge for yourself. You are wasting time and money on any other attorney, just hire the best, Mr. Floyd.
-
John T. Floyd and his team are some of the best people! I was able to get a second opinion from them on legal advice. His team has been honest, kind, and very informative which has … More been a huge blesssing.
-
I highly recommend John T. Floyd Lawfirm. They are truly knowledgeable and willing to go the extra mile to defend your innocence. Psalms 35
-
Outstanding!Professional knowledge. Rich experiences. Good outcome.
-
-
The best lawyer I ever encounter with a very good personality. He’s very professional and he will go far and beyond for his clients best interest. He’s definitely a 5 star attorney … More when it comes to delivering. I couldn’t be more happier that I hired him !! 👏👏👏👏
-
-
I can honestly say from what I have seen so far, Floyd is a compassionate soul who cares for his client's. Floyd is by far very knowledgeable in this area. He's currently … More assisting my [Father] on a sex assault. We are all suffering so much as my father is an elder man, but we have faith in God, and Mr. Floyd he can dismissed this outrageous allegation soon. Thank you, yoli
-
I had wonderful experience with this law firm. They were so helpful and knowledgeable of the process.my case was dismissed because of Mr John T Floyd,thank you for everything .
-
I am very happy today my case dismissed God bless Mr John T Floyd very good lawyer thanks you so mush sir
-
I had a great experience with this Law Firm, the kind staff helped me locate a Lawyer even though they were unable to take my case.
They were very helpful, kind and returned my call … More in a timely manner. I would definitely recommend them and use them in the future. -
I can tell that Jone is an excellent attorney in Houston. Personally, he is a great man. In addition to great service and amazing results. Recommended
-
Mr. Floyd is an incredible attorney and human being. He cares about your case, the facts, the law, and your life! I am sorry for whatever situation you are going through, but choosing … More Mr. Floyd, his firm, and their professional experience to help you, will be the best decision you ever make!
-
John T Floyd is a straight shooter! He was very direct and responsive to my phone calls and questions. I was in awe of his knowledge, and professional decorum! The best decision that … More you could make is to schedule a consultation with him before considering anyone else!
-
I asked the Law Office of John T. Floyd a very important question regarding the legal aspects of purchasing a firearm with a deferred adjudication charge. They answered the question … More very professionally and accurately and I was quite pleased with the information that was shared. I recommend this law firm because they are very honest and will work for you and with you.
-
I’ve never been one to write reviews but this time I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to say something. I had some serious legal questions I needed answers to concerning Texas laws. … More Being I’m from another state, I found and reached out to Attorney John Floyd for the answers. Mr Floyd listened to to my requests and told me what he need from me and went out of his way to get me the answers. Very polite, straightforward and professional, I can’t thank him enough for all he’s done. Whatever your legal case may be, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Mr Floyd.
-
John & Chris helped my family member get a reduced charge and acceptable plea agreement in place. Their compassion, attention to every detail was what helped carry the day.Truly … More the best of the best.P
-
Mr. Floyd is both ethical and loyal to his clients; two qualities that are hard to find specially in lawyers. I'd definitely recommend him to anyone.Positive
Professionalism …More … More -
Mr. John was very helpful and truly was the reason why my case was dismissed. Thank you so much Mr. John I truly recommend everyone in need to work with him.
-
His service to the community and diligence to helping his clients speaks for its self! Not to mention the many articles, papers and TV appearances that speak to his intellect
-
John has given Excellent service and have been very friendly and extremely helpful to us. I highly recommend this law firm
-
This law firm is diligent, responsive and succeeded in getting my case dismissed. 10/10 would recommend.
-
super knowledgeable, good attitude, would definitely recommend him
-
Very helpful, knowledgeable and honest.
-
John is an amazing person and lawyer who is actually very understanding of how anxious I got and although it was hard to reach him sometimes because of his schedule, but never worry … More he is on top of things. He is very organized, very smart. I had the experience to go through a trial with him, and he always plans ahead well and is actually open and receptive to any ideas and comments I had and he was quick to decide which is right to use at the moment. I really appreciated working with him and Chris. Great lawyers and great people. As I was reminded by John, I am adding that the Jury reached a not guilty decision on the original charge and on a lesser charge in just 25 minutes. It took more time to write the charge and instructions for the jury than it took them to reach a decision.
-
Highly recommend John T Floyd law firm, great response time and demeanor.I was researching an on-going criminal case, when I found an informative article written by John Floyd (about … More the perils of expert testimony). I called his office, and was very pleased to receive a timely call back. Not only was Mr. Floyd candid and helpful, but he had the kindest demeanor of any attorney that I've dealt with. I am so glad to have found this firm.
-
Although I am not a client, John Floyd contacted me the same day I sent an email requesting advice, answered my questions and even when further to assist with my issue and communicated … More with me the next day. A true credit to his profession and I can only imagine how well he provides services to his actual clients!
-
I give Mr. Floyd 10 Stars if they were available so I'm giving him five that's all that's available. The first time I left a message for him it was on a Friday after … More 5 p.m. and within 15 minutes he called me back I told him I needed to buy a lotto ticket because that has never happened. I knew from our chat and him calling me back that he was different from any attorney I've tried to talk to left messages never got called back they didn't even know what I needed and neither did Mr. Floyd but he did call me back. I was very interested in meeting with mr. Floyd about my case because I felt he was very transparent honest and genuine. If you've ever dealt with attorneys they don't have those traits but Mr. Floyd does. He was very honest with me told me what I could and could not do with my case. He is not egotistical he's very compassionate and he actually reads the documents you sent him unbelievable that's never happened. He will be the only lawyer I refer to anyone that needs his expertise. If you're in need of a criminal defense attorney please give John T Floyd a call you will not be disappointed.
-
Mr John is a great human being and a very knowledgeable attorney. He has always called me back promptly,advised me very clearly and never rushed our conversation. i was wrongfully accused … More and Mr John had my case DISMISSED!! on the day of trial after fighting for me for two years. I am very thankful to the John T. Floyd Law Firm. You will not go wrong with John. Mr John you deserve way more then 5 stars.Thank youShaikh.
-
John Floyd Law Firm is highly recommended for your legal needs. He and his staff are highly professional in every aspect. Easy and comfortable feeling talking with him, and he understands … More your needs and explains your legal advice in a way you can understand. Enough just cant be said. Thank You Sir.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John was kind enough to assist me with legal advise on my firearm gun rights restoration. I highly recommend him and his firm. Very professional and knowledgeable. If I need assistance … More in the future I will definitely go back to him.
-
What I liked the most was that he actually returned my phone after leaving a message unlike pretty much everyone else I called prior. He listened and answered my question with the best … More advice that would benefit me the most. I was actually lost from moving to Texas from a different state we’re laws vary and he pointed me toward the right direction to get a understanding of if I need to do business with him now or after I contact a lawyer in my home state.
-
John T Floyd handled my sons case & got a dismissal for us! He is great to work with, gets back to you promptly & knows what he’s doing. Definitely one of the best we have had … More to deal with!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John is honestly the best! The whole team is. He answered me in a timely manner and helped me when my friend was going through a situation in Houston, Texas as an inmate. He was so … More thorough, honest, and without charging me sent me so much information because I was out of the loop. He never once tried to take you for your money, he did all that he could to. help me and I can't thank him enough.
-
I have used John on two occasions and found him to have full knowledge of Texas law, diligent, creative in plan, and aggressive in defense. He is the best criminal defense attorney … More in the State of Texas. No reason to look elsewhere.
-
I have been calling to get some legal advice pertaining to gun rights. A few legal offices would not even take my call because quote " your not a client and Im losing money. … More I I called John T. Floyd Law Firm and they were not only able to answer my question, but gave great detail information, and further elaborated on their answer. I hope I do not have to use them in the future, but if I do need to, they will be my first call.
-
Great lawyer! Needed some advice and gave me a Consultation, and advice for steps to take, without any hassle l, Was a honest guy and actually wanted to help me and not just take my … More money! Highly recommend!!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Attorney Floyd replied very timely to my inquiry and he provided practical advice. I will not hesitate to contact him in the future if I need additional legal counsel.
-
Highly recommend, down to earth lawyer. Talked to me about my legal issues without being super money hungry and genuinely wanted to help me with my legal problems. 5 stars ⭐️.
-
Very knowledgeable and professional. I called and left a message Friday morning and before end of business that day I received a call back.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism … More …More -
Very helpful highly recommended for any Question / case will definitely keep he's name and number for any other legal advice
-
Excellent service and a lawyer that doesn't lie. He does what he says. JW recommends him.
-
One of the best services Ive used in awhile. Thank you for all the help and answers. You got my life back. Thank youPositive
Quality …More -
Im impressed. This guy was polite and professional and most important...he listened.
-
Good experience and very good lawyer
-
-
-
Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, ValueMore -
It was a pleasure speaking with John. He is knowledgeable and has a true desire to help the people of society. I turned to him for some guidance of a long-standing issue. He never … More rushed our conversation and went out of his way to look into the details to provide the right answer as well as assist me anyway he could. Thank you for our conversations and I wish your and your firm the best. If you need a lawyer, John Floyd is your guy!
-
John represented me in court for roughly 2 years. I won't (and shouldn't) get into any serious details, but let me tell you that I couldn't have chosen anyone better. … More Seriously.Every appearance in court I felt very comfortable. The judge and DA's had a high regard for his reputation. There is a time I recall where simply his presence greatly impacted the court's interpretation of my case and persons. We were in front of the stand and the judge could not stop talking about John's prestige and past accomplishments and how that took in relation to my case. I kept silent in front of the judge, but I observed then that John's popularity and reputation within the court had already given me a better looking rapport with the judge. Let me tell you, I never had more confidence then, knowing that the judge held him in such high regard.This is not to mention how personable John is. I'll be honest that during the stress of court, sharing a laugh with your lawyer helps a lot. This may sound a lot, but I really appreciated the relationship we had then. This is also not to mention that he was able to deal very well with any DA that rotated over the years. Seriously, John was great, prompt with information and very hands on with my case. I had great peace those 2 years until everything wrapped up.If you're looking for a lawyer, I highly, HIGHLY recommend the John T. Floyd Law Firm. He IS nationally renowned, you know. He'll get the job done to the utmost confidence. He's very experienced and has a great record to boot. I am glad to have had him represent me in court and trust me that I never thought I'd ever say that (and whoever does?). We explored every avenue of victory together and I personally enjoyed the experience, despite the seriousness of the accusation.If you have a case that needs to be represented at the highest levels, choose John T. Floyd. He's a good man and very good at what he does. Him and his team has the experience you need to make the best decisions and options to get the best outcome for your case. We got the best result I could possibly ask for, thank God.Seriously. Hire John. He knows what he's doing.Seriously.
-
One of the few honest lawyers I have ever talked to. His complimentary consultation was knowledgeable and thorough. He knew exactly what the issue was and how to handle it. His candid … More appraisal of the situation and how to proceed saved me thousands of dollars in legal fees. If you have a case requiring expertise in John's area of practice, look no further. Hire this man!
-
I had the opportunity to read an article that Mr. Floyd wrote and it was very interesting. I called him about the article and advice concerning a similar situation. He not only gave … More me excellent advice, he pointed out not just what I wanted to hear but what I needed to hear concerning my situation. The Good, The Bad and The ugly in a manner or speaking. He spoke with an open and honest heart with information to help me and not just to get a client.
-
If you are in trouble and need a lawyer, contact the John T. Floyd law firm. Some of the best lawyers in Texas work there! Understanding and helpful lawyers and staff that will do all … More they can to help you 😊
-
He gave me one of the most honest answers I have received in a very long time about any issue I was having with anything. Legal or not legal. I highly recommend giving him a call and … More will be referring him to friends and family if they have any issues in the future.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He took time out of his day to answer my legal questions and didn’t even charge me. I would definitely recommend him to you.
-
Gave free consultation on getting gun rights back. He truly cares about gun rights and getting you the help you deserve. 100% worth a callPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, … More Value …More -
Very professional, great quality work, and very friendly and helpful. Overall, their service is phenomenal. I recommend Mr. Floyd to anyone.
-
Mr. Floyd took the time to explain his experience with the law to me in layman's terms. Definitely give him a call.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He was honest , knowledgeable , and professional about what we talked about. Most lawyers are just about the money , but not john.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He was very truthful and honest with us very great man I would recommend him and we would use him again
-
Very professional honest and works hard currently working my husband’s appeal I pray he does his best workPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I contacted John T. Floyd Law firm and I was very satisfied with service extremely helpful and friendly thank you Mr. FloydPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More … More -
This law frim was informative,great response time ,and the attorney called back not some secretary or legal assistant thank u guys for all your help wish it was more like youPositive … More
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I would highly recommend Mr Floyd. He was very helpful and knowledge with a legal question I had.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He explained my case better then any other lawyerPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Very informative
-
-
-
-
Had the pleasure speaking with John Floyd on a personal matter, he was very responsive, nothing but exceptional, and he really cares about you with sincerity and most importantly knows … More what is he talking about! No games or bs, his approach to my situation even though I knew it was probably way smaller then what he normally takes on, he was extremely helpful and didn't care about the size of the matter like other attorneys do. He really looked out for my best interests. You can tell he has decades of experience doing what he does just by chatting with him. I would highly recommend him.
-
Words can’t describe how grateful I am for working with John, he went above and beyond my expectation. I was wrongly accused and hired many lawyers before hiring John Floyd but they … More all disappointed me, I had lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to John. From the start he had my best interest in mind and gave helpful advice, he explained the process and guided me. He put more work and time than all my previous lawyers that cost me thousands of dollars. He was constantly communicating with court and defended me more than all lawyer i had hired before him. Don’t waste your time and money like I did, believe me when I say I hired countless lawyers before him and no one came close to John. I’m forever thankful for him for fighting for my innocence and getting my case dismissed. Thank you so much🙏🏼🙏🏼
-
I called Mr Floyd and left a message, with in the hour I received a call back with much more information then I could have ever expected. Mr Floyd was very informative on every question … More I had for him. He seemed like he cared, instead of like most attorneys that you talk to that are just out for a quick buck. If you want someone that is going to shoot strait with you, and has your best interest in hand, this is you guy. This was the best experience that I have ever had with an lawyer.
-
I can state with confidence that Mr. Floyd and his team are the most competent and professional lawyers one can hope for. My case was quite complex and I admit that as a law student … More I was not the most patient client. Mr. Floyd did a phenomenal job of managing the bench, prosecution and myself! The result was above expectation, and I will never hesitate to recommend this firm regardless of the caliber of the case at issue.
-
It was a pleasure working with Mr. Floyd. I contacted him regarding a legal matter and he was extremely knowledgeable about the law, and responded in a timely manner. I appreciated … More the fact I did not feel rushed, and he made sure he thoroughly answered all questions I had. I would highly recommend him!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
Spoke with John Floyd about a 45 year old criminal case I was involved in. I had very little information about the case and John helped me search what records were available and gave … More me guidance to find more information. He was very professional and took his time helping me. I may need to hire a lawyer on this case and Mr. Floyd will be the man.Thanks John.
-
Very professional and straight forward. He's not going to waste your time or money. Very knowledgeable in a large range of possible matters one could face living in these days … More and times. If ever you need legal assistance, this is who I would suggest. Awesome!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I called about some legal questions I needed to get clarified and John was able to give me clarification and sound advice. I will definitely contact John for all future legal questions … More and issues.Thank you John!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism, Value …More -
Knows his stuff and well respected with DA and judges. I have referred him a couple times and every client has been satisfied
-
John is beyond knowledgeable! If I decide to pursue my case any further I would only have him represent me.
-
What a great attorney, this guy really took time out of his day to answer my questions and explain my case to me. Very grateful, thank you so muchPositive
Professionalism …More -
Absolutely a very professional lawyer. Very well read in the current law and more than willing to help if needed.
-
Mr. John he’s a professional he knows what he’s doing and he’s patient they recommend Him stronglyPositive
Professionalism …More -
Great service, very knowledgable and happy to help with any questions I had
-
Quick to action and helpful and knowledgeable with entertainment industry based issues!
-
Responded on a holiday week. Very knowledgeable and reassuring.
-
Very professional
-
-
-
-
I want to thank John T. Floyd and all of his team. He is the best lawyer who cares aboutHis clients and fights really hard to get the best outcome. He is a fighter and he is awesome!!!I … More recommend if any one needs criminal defense , he is the BEST. We had a really serious caseAnd we are very thankful for the outcome. Thank you John!!!!! God bless you!!!!!!
-
The attorneys at John T. Floyd Law Firm work diligently to achieve the best possible results for their clients. They are caring and knowledgeable professionals. Their expertise in the … More law and their experience as trial attorneys makes them the right choice as a defense attorney. I recommend this law firm highly.
-
From beginning to end this firm handled my case like the top tier professionals they are. I would not trust ANYONE else with my legal needs after having less than stellar experiences … More with other teams. Thank you Floyd!!!
-
I really felt like the team cared about my case and am super satisfied with the outcome. Would not recommend anyone else!
-
These guys do amazing work and have phenomenal service! Hands down best in the Houston area!!
-
John and Chris are true professionals! Love those guys like family!
-
Mr. Floyd and his team are very knowledgeable, informative, and helpful.
-
A team you can depend on to stand up and fight for you to prove the truth the whole truth!
-
-
Mr. John T. Floyd represented me.I couldn't be happier with the outcome he managed to achieve on an VERY Important case that was dismissed the day of Trial. He is patient & … More very knowledgeable of the legal system. I HIGHLY recommend him to anyone in need of a lawyer!John, I am forever grateful & satisfied with the effort you put forth & all you did for me. Thank you isn't enough!God bless you & your family!
-
The John T. Floyd Law Firm assisted me, and I can tell you that the attorney took the time to answer my questions, and I didn't feel rushed or dismissed as I have experienced in … More the past with attorneys. The attorney was very nice and extremely knowledgeable. Initial impressions and continued excellent customer service are big factors for me and as such I would highly recommend this firm.
-
I thank you for your efforts to help Felons regain their Civil rights, and for the information on possession , I am A convicted Felon, no violent history. I am an expert shot, I am … More 76 yoa, and very concerned about the present lake of Security in our State and Country. God Bless and Prosper you in your efforts, Your friend, Sonny Bivens
-
I really appreciated both Chris and John helping with my legal questions and concerns. Both are good guys and I would not hesitate to recommend them.
-
Extremely helpful!!! Helping me understand the law.
John T. Floyd is Board Certified in Criminal Law By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Request A Confidential Consultation
Fields marked with an * are required
"*" indicates required fields
Copyright © 2024 John T. Floyd Law Firm • All rights reserved.
Designed & Developed by
