Blog
FALSE RAPE ALLEGATIONS
Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd Discusses False Child Sexual Assault Allegations and Defending the Wrongly Accused
In April 2008, after coming home late from a party, a Wunsche High School student told her father that she had been sexually assaulted at the party by a fellow student. The following day 54-year-old Ruben Cuellar-Romo went with his daughter to her school, and when the daughter pointed out a student as her attacker, Cuellar-Roma stabbed the male student in the chest, stomach and hand. Police quickly determined that the assaulted student, Joshua Chapa, had not been at the party and, therefore, could not have assaulted the girl. Cuellar-Roma was arrested and charged with aggravated assault and remains in the Harris County Jail under a $30,000 bond.
The case garnered extensive local media coverage, leading the evening television newscasts hyped by a number of pre-broadcast teases. The Houston Chronicle also gave the case prominent coverage. Then the alleged teenage victim, according Harris County Sheriff’s spokesman Lt. John Legg, started feeling guilty and recanted the false sexual assault allegation. The recantation story was buried deep in Chronicle. No charges have been filed against the victim.
“We are cognizant of the fact that she is young,” Lt. Legg was quoted in the abbreviated Chronicle article. “Unfortunately, the nature of her lie is very serious.”
To say that the “nature of her lie is very serious” is an understatement at best. False sexual assault allegations and “mistaken identification” influenced by police and victim misconduct are far more prevalent in this country’s criminal justice system than most people realize. Innocent men have spent decades of their lives in prison because of false or tainted mistaken identification in sexual assault cases.
In 1995 one of the nation’s largest child sexual abuse scandals erupted in Wenatchee, Washington in what Washington Times reporter Paul Craig Roberts described as “the worst witch hunt in U.S. history.” Roberts reported that parents, Sunday school teachers, and a local pastor were convicted of raping their own children and the children of other members of a reputed “sex ring.” Forty-three adults were falsely accused on 29,726 “fabricated charges of child sex abuse involving 60 children” according to Roberts.
This “witch hunt” began when a Child Protective Services supervisor told the Wenatchee office to stir up some child sex abuse cases to justify its budget. Before the hunt was over CPS was reporting that each child – some only infants – had suffered an average of 495 rapes resulting in one parent being charged with 3,200 counts of sex abuse.
“A stench of evil hung about these cases,” Roberts wrote in 2002. “[They] were trumped up by Child Protective Services officials with an eye on their budget and jobs and by a police detective, Bob Perez, with the complicity of local prosecutors, judges, and political and media establishments. My early columns were greeted with derision by the local radio station (KPQ) and newspaper, the Wenatchee World. The few witnesses in the cases, a single mother and two young girls, later recanted in sworn court documents and before TV audiences. The young girls described how they were threatened and beaten, with one apparently suffering a broken arm, by Detective Perez, who used acts of violence to coerce false accusations. One young woman described how she was kidnapped by Detective Perez and locked up in a psychiatric facility, where a ‘recovered memory’ therapist gave her mind-altering drugs in an attempt to get her to make false accusations against her parents. The state American Civil Liberties Union later verified her account.”
Armed with these staggering revelations, the news media – led by NBC News, Tom Grant a local television news reporter, and two Seattle Post-Intelligence reporters – began to unravel the false sexual abuse allegations conspiracy. CPS workers began to recant, saying they had been forced into making the false allegations. One CPS worker fled to Canada with his family because he feared arrest for refusing to go along with the conspiracy.
Wenatchee officials refused to budge. They steadfastly defended the false convictions.
“Spurred by the revelations of lawlessness in the system of criminal justice,” Roberts wrote, “the University of Washington Law School formed the Innocence Project Northwest, which has succeeded in obtaining the release of every adult victim of the false prosecutions. But spiteful public officials still refuse to return the children to their parents. None of the public officials who broke the law, tampered with witnesses and fabricated evidence in order to convict the innocent have been indicted. However, civil cases have found the city of Wenatchee and Douglas County negligent in the child sex abuse cases, and multimillion-dollar judgments have been awarded. The state Department of Social and Health Services and Chelan County have settled other civil cases with large awards.”
The Wenatchee “witch hunt” was spawned by what Roberts called a “liberal mantra that 3 out of 4 children are subjected to sex abuse by a parent, close relative or child-care provider.” It is this mantra that has led to harsh state and federal legislation in “child sex abuse” cases and created an industry of “child advocates,” therapists, and CPS “caseworkers” who are quick to turn Johnny’s football bruises or Jenny’s sensitivity to a towel touching her genital area into “child sex abuse” cases which are then prosecuted by “special units” assigned by politically-motivated district attorneys.
“These mechanisms for the miscarriage of justice are in place in every city and town in the U.S.,” wrote Roberts. “Liberals do not doubt that public officials can be trusted with power, but liberals know parents cannot be trusted with children. This misplaced confidence is responsible for the miscarriage of justice in Wenatchee. Will your community be next?”
In 1996 the United States Justice Department released the results of a study which found that as many as 20 to 25 percent of criminal defendants prosecuted in sex crimes are innocent. The first person exonerated by DNA was an Illinois inmate named Gene Dotson who was freed in 1989 after serving ten years on a false rape conviction.
False rape convictions set aside by DNA evidence have now become legion in this country. In the May 3, 2007 edition of the Washington Post, David Fears wrote about the 200th person exonerated by DNA evidence. His name is Jerry Miller. He spent 25 years in the Illinois prison system for a rape he did not commit. He was the victim of a “mistaken identification.” The newspaper’s analysis of the 200 DNA exonerations found that 60 percent of the exonerated inmates were black or Hispanic; and that of those exonerated in rape cases, 85 percent were black men who were convicted of raping white women.
These troubling facts do not paint a pretty picture about the state fairness and equity in the nation’s criminal justice system. Have the demands by law-and-order advocates so intimated and politicized the justice system that a “witch hunt” rush to judgment now controls the system? The following 2008 sexual assault exonerations certainly support the notion that it has:
In January 2008 a North Texas custom homebuilder named Douglas Buchar was acquitted of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Two years before Buchar’s 12-year-old adopted daughter accused him of sexual assault. Child Protective Services immediately picked up his two other children from school and placed them in foster care. In the wake of the sexual allegation, Buchar and his wife also lost their home and business. During the trial, Buchar faced the false accuser. “Looking at her in court and what not, it was just, she had no clue what she has caused, nor do I think she really cares what she has caused. Yes, we do feel sorry for her.” The couple now faces a daunting task of having their biological children returned to them. Attorney Kelly Davis is working on that issue. “I think that Doug was able to prove to everybody else that he was innocent by performing all the different types of polygraph and tests that they required … in order to prove his innocence,” Davis said.
While Douglas Buchar was being acquitted, Rickey Johnson was released on January 14, 2008 from a Louisiana prison after serving 26 for a rape he did not commit. “Rickey Johnson lost more than a quarter of a century, nearly his entire adult life, to a wrongful conviction. He had three young children when he was arrested, and a fourth was born shortly after he was incarcerated; all of those children are now adults, and he has grandchildren he’s never met,” said Vanessa Potkin, the Innocence Project Staff Attorney representing Johnson. “Rickey Johnson’s long nightmare will be in vain if we don’t learn from it and make sure other people in Louisiana have access to DNA testing that can prove their innocence.” Not only did DNA evidence exonerate Johnson but led a match of another man named Carnell McNeal who was already in a Louisiana prison for a rape committed at the same apartment complex nine months after the rape Johnson had been wrongfully convicted of committing.
In April 2008 an inmate named Thomas McGowan became the 25th person exonerated by DNA evidence in Texas. Twenty-three years ago McGowan was convicted of rape in Dallas County and sentenced to two consecutive life terms. “Thomas McGowan was in his mid-20s when he was arrested, and he’ll turn 50 later this year. He has lost nearly his entire adult life to a wrongful conviction that could have – and should have – been prevented,” said Barry Scheck, Co-Director of the Innocence Project, which is affiliated with Cardozo School of Law. “This is the 25th case in Texas where DNA proved that eyewitness identification was incorrect. How many more people need to lose years or decades of their lives before the state implements simple reforms that are proven to make eyewitness identification more accurate?” The police “pushed” the victim into identifying McGowan. “Just a few simple words can change everything. In this case, a few words from the police officer administering the lineup cost Thomas McGowan 23 years of his life,” Scheck said. “The officer forced the victim into certainty when she wasn’t sure whether Mr. McGowan was the perpetrator. While we sometimes hear of outrageous lineup procedures, improperly pushing a witness into certainty is much more common.”
On May 21, 2008 a Michigan inmate named Walter Smith, who had been wrongfully convicted of a 1982 Detroit rape, was exonerated by a wide range of evidence. “For 26 long years, Walter Swift has held onto hope that the truth would finally come out and he would be exonerated. Today, his unimaginable nightmare is ending but he is just beginning the long road to rebuild his life,” said Barry Scheck. “He was convicted based on a deeply flawed and completely unreliable eyewitness identification. Even at the time of his trial in 1982, there was convincing evidence that he was innocent, but his court-appointed attorney failed to present that evidence.” Smith was denied parole five times since 2000 because he would not admit to guilt.
On May 27, 2008 Dean Cage was released after spending 12 years in the Illinois prison system for a rape he did not commit. Dean became the 24th innocent person exonerated by DNA evidence in the state of Illinois. Cage was convicted for the November 1994 rape of a 15-year-old girl based exclusively on the victim’s mistaken identification. The identification procedures were handled by the detective who conducted the investigation, and research by the Innocence Project has shown that this procedure enhances victim misidentification in sexual assault cases.
An attorney defending a client charged with a sexual assault offense, particularly one involving a child victim, must understand both the alleged offender and victim. Any defense in such a case requires extensive investigation and planning in order to develop a successful defense. It is a difficult, awesome responsibility. Writing in the IPT Journal (Vol. 2, 1992), attorney Joel Erik Thompson observed:
“Is there any crime worse than murder? If the feelings and emotions of the community (hence the pool from which jurors are chosen and to which the media appeals) provide any indication, the answer to the question is a resounding ‘Yes.’ If you are not convinced, at your next social gathering casually mention that you are defending someone accused of child sexual assault. The predictable response is for listeners to wrinkle up their noses and state with disgust, ‘How can you represent such scum?’ If your reply is, ‘Because my client is innocent,’ anticipate your listeners will respond, ‘Oh, sure,’ with obvious disbelief. Had you told these same listeners you were defending someone charged with murder, a predictable response would be, ‘That sounds really interesting. Tell me about the case.’
“This is not intended as an accurate, scientific assessment of community attitude, but merely an illustration of the substantial biases, rigid ideation and deep-seated emotionalism that surround allegations of child molestation. What can you say in defense of a person who forces or coerces a child into sexual activity? How loathsome for an adult to misuse and abuse a child’s naiveté, trust and love merely to satisfy a lustful urge. Yet consider the converse. How terrifying, frustrating and disillusioning must it be for an innocent person to be accused of such conduct, particularly so when the accused is a teacher, stepparent, neighbor or other person who has extended himself to care about, love and counsel a troubled child. Is there a more malicious way to violate the Ninth Commandment and bear false witness against a person?”
The inevitable question arises: how can a false child sexual abuse allegation be made? Thompson answered this question by listing the kind of people involved in the making of such allegations:
The malicious and hateful may include a spiteful neighbor who maliciously reports that the person3 next door molested an infant by “touching” its genitals, knowing the report is false (medical examination would detect no signs to either corroborate or rebut such an allegation).
The emotionally driven may include a vengeful spouse frustrated by custody/visitation arrangements in a divorce who alleges molestation of the child by the other spouse hoping to terminate a spouse’s contact with the child. It may include a 14-year-old stepdaughter who resents mother’s new husband because “he broke up Mom and Dad’s marriage,” because he has assumed the role of household disciplinarian or because “nobody ever asked me if it was okay for him to move into our family.”
The well-intended but misguided may include the teacher, medical professional, detective or other who relies on training, reading and observations to reach conclusions that are correct.
The unskilled or inept include those who incorrectly presume a child’s actions or sexual interest result from being victimized, as well as those who unintentionally “create” molestation reports by unskillful questioning of a child or improper identification techniques. It is not just defense lawyers, or their experts who are concerned about this problem. Responsible police and social welfare agencies share the concern for objectively gathering the facts before reaching conclusion and for protecting the true victim.
It can reasonably be speculated that the jury was not impressed with the testimony of the stepdaughter who lied against Douglas Buchar. But that was the exception, not the rule. The rule is that testimony by sexual assault victims, especially pre-teens, is powerful and is the only evidence needed in states like Texas to secure a criminal conviction. In October 2004 a California Superior Court judge ordered the release of Peter Rose who had served 10 years for the sexual assault of a 13-year-old Lodi girl. Rose was an acquaintance of the victim’s family. The victim initially told police she had been raped by a stranger, but later said her assailant was Rose after the victim’s aunt suggested he was her attacker. The aunt had longstanding “personal problems” with Rose. During an initial police interview following the aunt’s suggestion that Rose had been the assailant, the victim said he “might” have been the attacker. By the time of trial, the young victim was “positive” that Rose was the man who raped her. The North California Innocence Project at Golden State University School of Law in San Francisco, however, managed to secure DNA testing that proved Rose was innocent and had been falsely accused by the young victim because of “personal problems” victim’s aunt had with Rose.
It doesn’t take much for a man to be wrongfully charged and put to trial on false sexual assault allegations. Just two years ago a Connecticut Superior Court judge awarded $3.5 million in damages to Ajai Bhatia against a former fiancée who was falsely accused him in 2001of sexually abusing their four-year-old daughter. While a criminal court jury acquitted Bhatia of the false allegations, the charges cost him a $100,000-a-year engineering job, his home, and tens of thousands of dollars in legal expenses. The Hartford Courant on July 2, 2006 reported the following on the case:
“It was a bittersweet victory for Ajai Bhatia [who] was escorted out of his engineering job at the Shelton office of Pitney-Bowes in handcuffs, accused of being a pedophile, on Dec. 26, 2001. He spent four days in jail. He endured a long criminal trial, was acquitted of sexual assault charges resulting from his fiancée’s complaint and has been the subject of multiple child-abuse investigations involving the state Department of Children and Families.
“But the whopping monetary award is little solace to Bhatia, who acknowledges that he will probably never recover anywhere near that amount from his former fiancée, Marlene Debek of Bridgeport. And he remains distraught over the damage the accusations have caused in his relationship with his daughter, now 9.
“After Bhatia was acquitted of the criminal charges in 2003, he filed a malicious prosecution lawsuit against Debek. Connecticut law allows individuals to sue their accusers in a criminal matter if they can prove the accusation was baseless and made with malice.
“In a ruling in that lawsuit earlier this month, Superior Court Judge Julia L. Aurigemma found that Debek had no probable cause to accuse Bhatia of a crime.
“‘She did so with malice in that her motive was to harm the plaintiff and keep him from having any contact with their daughter,’ Aurigemma wrote.’In the custody battle, Ms. Debek used the claim of sexual abuse as the final weapon in her arsenal against Mr. Bhatia when her other weapons, false-claims of physical violence and danger of [his] flight to India, were not effective.’
“Aurigemma awarded Bhatia $2.5 million in damages for his emotional distress, loss of reputation and humiliation, which the judge said was ‘staggering.’”
Michael G. Brock, who operates a Counseling and Evaluation Services in Michigan, has written extensively about false allegations of sexual abuse in such child custody cases. He said these cases generally begin with a custody dispute between the parents during or after the divorce proceedings. The allegation of sexual abuse is usually made by the parent with custody of the child. Child Protective Services enters the picture and conducts interviews with the alleged child victim. Absent any physical evidence of abuse, CPS does not take any affirmative action other than suggesting that the child receive therapy. Additional reports of abuse are then made to CPS. More interviews are conducted. This time the child is referred to a hospital where medical examinations are preformed for physical evidence of sex abuse. These examinations can often produce misleading evidence such as “hymeneal irregularities” or “findings of past trauma.”
“But the urologist with whom I confer on these cases tells me that the smallest amount of pressure on a child’s hymen is sufficient to rupture it,” Brock says.
In most instances, however, there is no real evidence of sexual abuse. Some doctors, however, will put a qualified conclusion in their reports saying that the lack of physical evidence does not mean sexual abuse did not occur. This effectively puts the issue of abuse back with the child victim alleging she or he has been sexually abused.
Medical personnel conducting any sexual abuse examination must report the matter to the police. This initiates the law enforcement investigation. The investigation starts with one or more interviews with the alleged child victim, leading investigators to draw their own conclusions. The investigators will then ask the accused parent to take a polygraph, even though such evidence is not admissible in court. If the accused parent is represented by counsel at this stage, counsel will advise either for or against the polygraph depending upon the factual circumstances. The investigators will frequently lie to the accused parent telling him that he failed the polygraph when, in fact, he passed it. At this point the investigators want a confession. Courts have held that it is permissible for the police to lie to a criminal suspect in order to obtain a confession.
Once the police complete their investigation, they turn the evidence over to the district attorney’s office where the decision is made to bring charges or dismiss the case. The accused parent’s innocence is not the prosecutor’s primary concern. The prosecutor’s concern is whether or not he or she can secure a criminal conviction. Prosecutors often seek convictions, not innocence. Some are so committed to this prosecutorial objective that they will knowingly use perjured testimony, suppress mitigating evidence, fabricate evidence, and even manipulate forensic evidence to secure a conviction.
Michael Brock offers the following suggestions in false sexual abuse cases:
The accused parent, or any accused person, must take the allegations very seriously. These allegations obtain a life of their own. The Douglas Buchar and Ajai Bhatia cases illustrate this point quite clearly. There is an official desire to investigate, prosecute, and convict in cases where child sexual abuse is alleged.
Hire an attorney experienced in handling child sexual assault cases. The primary objective of the accused should be to convince the attorney of his/her innocence. Attorneys have personal feelings about the need to protect children from abuse. If the accused is guilty, he/she should make sure the attorney is aware of this guilt. Never lie to the person who has your life in his/her hands.
The attorney should explore the need to arrange a “videotaped forensic interview” with the alleged child victim. This interview should be conducted by the protocol adopted by the state where the offense occurred. If the charging state does not have an adopted protocol, the attorney should secure an interview from a nationally recognized researcher in the field of child interviews. This investigative procedure may necessitate an order from the court.
“The biggest threat to any innocent client is the treatment professional,” Brock says. “Typically, they have the least training in forensic procedures of anyone involved, and their recommendations tend to carry a lot of weight with the court…Treatment professionals are legally very unsophisticated people. The notion of due process of law and constitutional guarantees of a fair and impartial trial hearing, or that their role in that process is influenced as much (and usually more) by what the presenting parent has said as it is by what the child is telling them, usually never occurs to them.”
The attorney should investigate the laws governing access to treatment records. Some states permit parents to have access to their child’s records whether he/she has custody or not. These records will reflect the number, intensity, and depth of interviews conducted by a therapist. These records will also reveal what, if any, input the accusing parent has had in the treatment process. Some therapists will allow the accusing parent direct access to the interview and counseling process.
The attorney should determine whether there is a need to hire a forensic mental health expert to examine the state’s case for possible weaknesses or factual errors. Some attorneys do not have the skills to know what to look for in sexual abuse case records. Brock suggests that an attorney consult “Investigative Interviews of Children” by Michael Lamb and Deborah Poole and “Jeopardy in the Courtroom” by Steven Ceci and Maggi Bruck. These researchers outline what they consider are “proper evidence and interviewing techniques.” Brock also recommends his own website, www.michaelgbrock.com., and articles available on the “Truth in Justice” website.
These suggestions are important for an attorney representing a client in Texas for any child sexual assault allegation. The testimony of the child victim alone is sufficient to support a conviction for aggravated sexual assault. Texas Code Criminal Procedure, Article 38.07. Texas courts are required to give “wide latitude” to the testimony of a child sexual abuse victim. See: Villalon v. State, 791 S.W.2d 130, 134 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990)[en banc]. The victim is not required to give a precise description of what happened to her or express herself with the level of sophistication as an adult. Id. And there is no requirement that the child victim’s testimony be corroborated by medical or physical evidence. See: Sauceda v. State, 2005 Tex.App. LEXIS 6001 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2005).
Facing these strict evidentiary rules, a criminal defense attorney in Texas has a difficult task surmounting false sexual assault allegations. But it can be done with proper investigation, pretrial planning, and a defense strategy for the trial. The key is investigation and planning.
Take the first step toward protecting your freedom by contacting us now
Testimonials
John T. Floyd Law Firm
3730 Kirby Drive # 750, Houston
-
If you have hired attorneys that meet the Webster dictionary definition, ie: "Attorney " is a person that has a law degree, will not be totally honest, can take your money … More and not earn it, will put you off until he is ready to talk to you, and/or never study your case to be able to defend you. Mr. Floyd is the only attorney that doesn't fit that definition!! You will be delighted to have Mr. John Floyd in your corner! Not one attorney that I have ever met that would ever return a check that I sent to him, because he said I paid him too much! Wow! That right there should tell you something about his integrity!!!!! He has a very calm demeanor and doesn't stretch the truth even if you don't want to hear it, he will tell you the truth. Call and set up an appointment with him and judge for yourself. You are wasting time and money on any other attorney, just hire the best, Mr. Floyd.
-
John T. Floyd and his team are some of the best people! I was able to get a second opinion from them on legal advice. His team has been honest, kind, and very informative which has … More been a huge blesssing.
-
I highly recommend John T. Floyd Lawfirm. They are truly knowledgeable and willing to go the extra mile to defend your innocence. Psalms 35
-
Outstanding!Professional knowledge. Rich experiences. Good outcome.
-
-
The best lawyer I ever encounter with a very good personality. He’s very professional and he will go far and beyond for his clients best interest. He’s definitely a 5 star attorney … More when it comes to delivering. I couldn’t be more happier that I hired him !! 👏👏👏👏
-
-
I can honestly say from what I have seen so far, Floyd is a compassionate soul who cares for his client's. Floyd is by far very knowledgeable in this area. He's currently … More assisting my [Father] on a sex assault. We are all suffering so much as my father is an elder man, but we have faith in God, and Mr. Floyd he can dismissed this outrageous allegation soon. Thank you, yoli
-
I had wonderful experience with this law firm. They were so helpful and knowledgeable of the process.my case was dismissed because of Mr John T Floyd,thank you for everything .
-
I am very happy today my case dismissed God bless Mr John T Floyd very good lawyer thanks you so mush sir
-
I had a great experience with this Law Firm, the kind staff helped me locate a Lawyer even though they were unable to take my case.
They were very helpful, kind and returned my call … More in a timely manner. I would definitely recommend them and use them in the future. -
I can tell that Jone is an excellent attorney in Houston. Personally, he is a great man. In addition to great service and amazing results. Recommended
-
Mr. Floyd is an incredible attorney and human being. He cares about your case, the facts, the law, and your life! I am sorry for whatever situation you are going through, but choosing … More Mr. Floyd, his firm, and their professional experience to help you, will be the best decision you ever make!
-
John T Floyd is a straight shooter! He was very direct and responsive to my phone calls and questions. I was in awe of his knowledge, and professional decorum! The best decision that … More you could make is to schedule a consultation with him before considering anyone else!
-
I asked the Law Office of John T. Floyd a very important question regarding the legal aspects of purchasing a firearm with a deferred adjudication charge. They answered the question … More very professionally and accurately and I was quite pleased with the information that was shared. I recommend this law firm because they are very honest and will work for you and with you.
-
I’ve never been one to write reviews but this time I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to say something. I had some serious legal questions I needed answers to concerning Texas laws. … More Being I’m from another state, I found and reached out to Attorney John Floyd for the answers. Mr Floyd listened to to my requests and told me what he need from me and went out of his way to get me the answers. Very polite, straightforward and professional, I can’t thank him enough for all he’s done. Whatever your legal case may be, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Mr Floyd.
-
John & Chris helped my family member get a reduced charge and acceptable plea agreement in place. Their compassion, attention to every detail was what helped carry the day.Truly … More the best of the best.P
-
Mr. Floyd is both ethical and loyal to his clients; two qualities that are hard to find specially in lawyers. I'd definitely recommend him to anyone.Positive
Professionalism …More … More -
Mr. John was very helpful and truly was the reason why my case was dismissed. Thank you so much Mr. John I truly recommend everyone in need to work with him.
-
His service to the community and diligence to helping his clients speaks for its self! Not to mention the many articles, papers and TV appearances that speak to his intellect
-
John has given Excellent service and have been very friendly and extremely helpful to us. I highly recommend this law firm
-
This law firm is diligent, responsive and succeeded in getting my case dismissed. 10/10 would recommend.
-
super knowledgeable, good attitude, would definitely recommend him
-
Very helpful, knowledgeable and honest.
-
John is an amazing person and lawyer who is actually very understanding of how anxious I got and although it was hard to reach him sometimes because of his schedule, but never worry … More he is on top of things. He is very organized, very smart. I had the experience to go through a trial with him, and he always plans ahead well and is actually open and receptive to any ideas and comments I had and he was quick to decide which is right to use at the moment. I really appreciated working with him and Chris. Great lawyers and great people. As I was reminded by John, I am adding that the Jury reached a not guilty decision on the original charge and on a lesser charge in just 25 minutes. It took more time to write the charge and instructions for the jury than it took them to reach a decision.
-
Highly recommend John T Floyd law firm, great response time and demeanor.I was researching an on-going criminal case, when I found an informative article written by John Floyd (about … More the perils of expert testimony). I called his office, and was very pleased to receive a timely call back. Not only was Mr. Floyd candid and helpful, but he had the kindest demeanor of any attorney that I've dealt with. I am so glad to have found this firm.
-
Although I am not a client, John Floyd contacted me the same day I sent an email requesting advice, answered my questions and even when further to assist with my issue and communicated … More with me the next day. A true credit to his profession and I can only imagine how well he provides services to his actual clients!
-
I give Mr. Floyd 10 Stars if they were available so I'm giving him five that's all that's available. The first time I left a message for him it was on a Friday after … More 5 p.m. and within 15 minutes he called me back I told him I needed to buy a lotto ticket because that has never happened. I knew from our chat and him calling me back that he was different from any attorney I've tried to talk to left messages never got called back they didn't even know what I needed and neither did Mr. Floyd but he did call me back. I was very interested in meeting with mr. Floyd about my case because I felt he was very transparent honest and genuine. If you've ever dealt with attorneys they don't have those traits but Mr. Floyd does. He was very honest with me told me what I could and could not do with my case. He is not egotistical he's very compassionate and he actually reads the documents you sent him unbelievable that's never happened. He will be the only lawyer I refer to anyone that needs his expertise. If you're in need of a criminal defense attorney please give John T Floyd a call you will not be disappointed.
-
Mr John is a great human being and a very knowledgeable attorney. He has always called me back promptly,advised me very clearly and never rushed our conversation. i was wrongfully accused … More and Mr John had my case DISMISSED!! on the day of trial after fighting for me for two years. I am very thankful to the John T. Floyd Law Firm. You will not go wrong with John. Mr John you deserve way more then 5 stars.Thank youShaikh.
-
John Floyd Law Firm is highly recommended for your legal needs. He and his staff are highly professional in every aspect. Easy and comfortable feeling talking with him, and he understands … More your needs and explains your legal advice in a way you can understand. Enough just cant be said. Thank You Sir.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John was kind enough to assist me with legal advise on my firearm gun rights restoration. I highly recommend him and his firm. Very professional and knowledgeable. If I need assistance … More in the future I will definitely go back to him.
-
What I liked the most was that he actually returned my phone after leaving a message unlike pretty much everyone else I called prior. He listened and answered my question with the best … More advice that would benefit me the most. I was actually lost from moving to Texas from a different state we’re laws vary and he pointed me toward the right direction to get a understanding of if I need to do business with him now or after I contact a lawyer in my home state.
-
John T Floyd handled my sons case & got a dismissal for us! He is great to work with, gets back to you promptly & knows what he’s doing. Definitely one of the best we have had … More to deal with!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John is honestly the best! The whole team is. He answered me in a timely manner and helped me when my friend was going through a situation in Houston, Texas as an inmate. He was so … More thorough, honest, and without charging me sent me so much information because I was out of the loop. He never once tried to take you for your money, he did all that he could to. help me and I can't thank him enough.
-
I have used John on two occasions and found him to have full knowledge of Texas law, diligent, creative in plan, and aggressive in defense. He is the best criminal defense attorney … More in the State of Texas. No reason to look elsewhere.
-
I have been calling to get some legal advice pertaining to gun rights. A few legal offices would not even take my call because quote " your not a client and Im losing money. … More I I called John T. Floyd Law Firm and they were not only able to answer my question, but gave great detail information, and further elaborated on their answer. I hope I do not have to use them in the future, but if I do need to, they will be my first call.
-
Great lawyer! Needed some advice and gave me a Consultation, and advice for steps to take, without any hassle l, Was a honest guy and actually wanted to help me and not just take my … More money! Highly recommend!!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Attorney Floyd replied very timely to my inquiry and he provided practical advice. I will not hesitate to contact him in the future if I need additional legal counsel.
-
Highly recommend, down to earth lawyer. Talked to me about my legal issues without being super money hungry and genuinely wanted to help me with my legal problems. 5 stars ⭐️.
-
Very knowledgeable and professional. I called and left a message Friday morning and before end of business that day I received a call back.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism … More …More -
Very helpful highly recommended for any Question / case will definitely keep he's name and number for any other legal advice
-
Excellent service and a lawyer that doesn't lie. He does what he says. JW recommends him.
-
One of the best services Ive used in awhile. Thank you for all the help and answers. You got my life back. Thank youPositive
Quality …More -
Im impressed. This guy was polite and professional and most important...he listened.
-
Good experience and very good lawyer
-
-
-
Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, ValueMore -
It was a pleasure speaking with John. He is knowledgeable and has a true desire to help the people of society. I turned to him for some guidance of a long-standing issue. He never … More rushed our conversation and went out of his way to look into the details to provide the right answer as well as assist me anyway he could. Thank you for our conversations and I wish your and your firm the best. If you need a lawyer, John Floyd is your guy!
-
John represented me in court for roughly 2 years. I won't (and shouldn't) get into any serious details, but let me tell you that I couldn't have chosen anyone better. … More Seriously.Every appearance in court I felt very comfortable. The judge and DA's had a high regard for his reputation. There is a time I recall where simply his presence greatly impacted the court's interpretation of my case and persons. We were in front of the stand and the judge could not stop talking about John's prestige and past accomplishments and how that took in relation to my case. I kept silent in front of the judge, but I observed then that John's popularity and reputation within the court had already given me a better looking rapport with the judge. Let me tell you, I never had more confidence then, knowing that the judge held him in such high regard.This is not to mention how personable John is. I'll be honest that during the stress of court, sharing a laugh with your lawyer helps a lot. This may sound a lot, but I really appreciated the relationship we had then. This is also not to mention that he was able to deal very well with any DA that rotated over the years. Seriously, John was great, prompt with information and very hands on with my case. I had great peace those 2 years until everything wrapped up.If you're looking for a lawyer, I highly, HIGHLY recommend the John T. Floyd Law Firm. He IS nationally renowned, you know. He'll get the job done to the utmost confidence. He's very experienced and has a great record to boot. I am glad to have had him represent me in court and trust me that I never thought I'd ever say that (and whoever does?). We explored every avenue of victory together and I personally enjoyed the experience, despite the seriousness of the accusation.If you have a case that needs to be represented at the highest levels, choose John T. Floyd. He's a good man and very good at what he does. Him and his team has the experience you need to make the best decisions and options to get the best outcome for your case. We got the best result I could possibly ask for, thank God.Seriously. Hire John. He knows what he's doing.Seriously.
-
One of the few honest lawyers I have ever talked to. His complimentary consultation was knowledgeable and thorough. He knew exactly what the issue was and how to handle it. His candid … More appraisal of the situation and how to proceed saved me thousands of dollars in legal fees. If you have a case requiring expertise in John's area of practice, look no further. Hire this man!
-
I had the opportunity to read an article that Mr. Floyd wrote and it was very interesting. I called him about the article and advice concerning a similar situation. He not only gave … More me excellent advice, he pointed out not just what I wanted to hear but what I needed to hear concerning my situation. The Good, The Bad and The ugly in a manner or speaking. He spoke with an open and honest heart with information to help me and not just to get a client.
-
If you are in trouble and need a lawyer, contact the John T. Floyd law firm. Some of the best lawyers in Texas work there! Understanding and helpful lawyers and staff that will do all … More they can to help you 😊
-
He gave me one of the most honest answers I have received in a very long time about any issue I was having with anything. Legal or not legal. I highly recommend giving him a call and … More will be referring him to friends and family if they have any issues in the future.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He took time out of his day to answer my legal questions and didn’t even charge me. I would definitely recommend him to you.
-
Gave free consultation on getting gun rights back. He truly cares about gun rights and getting you the help you deserve. 100% worth a callPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, … More Value …More -
Very professional, great quality work, and very friendly and helpful. Overall, their service is phenomenal. I recommend Mr. Floyd to anyone.
-
Mr. Floyd took the time to explain his experience with the law to me in layman's terms. Definitely give him a call.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He was honest , knowledgeable , and professional about what we talked about. Most lawyers are just about the money , but not john.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He was very truthful and honest with us very great man I would recommend him and we would use him again
-
Very professional honest and works hard currently working my husband’s appeal I pray he does his best workPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I contacted John T. Floyd Law firm and I was very satisfied with service extremely helpful and friendly thank you Mr. FloydPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More … More -
This law frim was informative,great response time ,and the attorney called back not some secretary or legal assistant thank u guys for all your help wish it was more like youPositive … More
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I would highly recommend Mr Floyd. He was very helpful and knowledge with a legal question I had.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He explained my case better then any other lawyerPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Very informative
-
-
-
-
Had the pleasure speaking with John Floyd on a personal matter, he was very responsive, nothing but exceptional, and he really cares about you with sincerity and most importantly knows … More what is he talking about! No games or bs, his approach to my situation even though I knew it was probably way smaller then what he normally takes on, he was extremely helpful and didn't care about the size of the matter like other attorneys do. He really looked out for my best interests. You can tell he has decades of experience doing what he does just by chatting with him. I would highly recommend him.
-
Words can’t describe how grateful I am for working with John, he went above and beyond my expectation. I was wrongly accused and hired many lawyers before hiring John Floyd but they … More all disappointed me, I had lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to John. From the start he had my best interest in mind and gave helpful advice, he explained the process and guided me. He put more work and time than all my previous lawyers that cost me thousands of dollars. He was constantly communicating with court and defended me more than all lawyer i had hired before him. Don’t waste your time and money like I did, believe me when I say I hired countless lawyers before him and no one came close to John. I’m forever thankful for him for fighting for my innocence and getting my case dismissed. Thank you so much🙏🏼🙏🏼
-
I called Mr Floyd and left a message, with in the hour I received a call back with much more information then I could have ever expected. Mr Floyd was very informative on every question … More I had for him. He seemed like he cared, instead of like most attorneys that you talk to that are just out for a quick buck. If you want someone that is going to shoot strait with you, and has your best interest in hand, this is you guy. This was the best experience that I have ever had with an lawyer.
-
I can state with confidence that Mr. Floyd and his team are the most competent and professional lawyers one can hope for. My case was quite complex and I admit that as a law student … More I was not the most patient client. Mr. Floyd did a phenomenal job of managing the bench, prosecution and myself! The result was above expectation, and I will never hesitate to recommend this firm regardless of the caliber of the case at issue.
-
It was a pleasure working with Mr. Floyd. I contacted him regarding a legal matter and he was extremely knowledgeable about the law, and responded in a timely manner. I appreciated … More the fact I did not feel rushed, and he made sure he thoroughly answered all questions I had. I would highly recommend him!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
Spoke with John Floyd about a 45 year old criminal case I was involved in. I had very little information about the case and John helped me search what records were available and gave … More me guidance to find more information. He was very professional and took his time helping me. I may need to hire a lawyer on this case and Mr. Floyd will be the man.Thanks John.
-
Very professional and straight forward. He's not going to waste your time or money. Very knowledgeable in a large range of possible matters one could face living in these days … More and times. If ever you need legal assistance, this is who I would suggest. Awesome!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I called about some legal questions I needed to get clarified and John was able to give me clarification and sound advice. I will definitely contact John for all future legal questions … More and issues.Thank you John!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism, Value …More -
Knows his stuff and well respected with DA and judges. I have referred him a couple times and every client has been satisfied
-
John is beyond knowledgeable! If I decide to pursue my case any further I would only have him represent me.
-
What a great attorney, this guy really took time out of his day to answer my questions and explain my case to me. Very grateful, thank you so muchPositive
Professionalism …More -
Absolutely a very professional lawyer. Very well read in the current law and more than willing to help if needed.
-
Mr. John he’s a professional he knows what he’s doing and he’s patient they recommend Him stronglyPositive
Professionalism …More -
Great service, very knowledgable and happy to help with any questions I had
-
Quick to action and helpful and knowledgeable with entertainment industry based issues!
-
Responded on a holiday week. Very knowledgeable and reassuring.
-
Very professional
-
-
-
-
I want to thank John T. Floyd and all of his team. He is the best lawyer who cares aboutHis clients and fights really hard to get the best outcome. He is a fighter and he is awesome!!!I … More recommend if any one needs criminal defense , he is the BEST. We had a really serious caseAnd we are very thankful for the outcome. Thank you John!!!!! God bless you!!!!!!
-
The attorneys at John T. Floyd Law Firm work diligently to achieve the best possible results for their clients. They are caring and knowledgeable professionals. Their expertise in the … More law and their experience as trial attorneys makes them the right choice as a defense attorney. I recommend this law firm highly.
-
From beginning to end this firm handled my case like the top tier professionals they are. I would not trust ANYONE else with my legal needs after having less than stellar experiences … More with other teams. Thank you Floyd!!!
-
I really felt like the team cared about my case and am super satisfied with the outcome. Would not recommend anyone else!
-
These guys do amazing work and have phenomenal service! Hands down best in the Houston area!!
-
John and Chris are true professionals! Love those guys like family!
-
Mr. Floyd and his team are very knowledgeable, informative, and helpful.
-
A team you can depend on to stand up and fight for you to prove the truth the whole truth!
-
-
Mr. John T. Floyd represented me.I couldn't be happier with the outcome he managed to achieve on an VERY Important case that was dismissed the day of Trial. He is patient & … More very knowledgeable of the legal system. I HIGHLY recommend him to anyone in need of a lawyer!John, I am forever grateful & satisfied with the effort you put forth & all you did for me. Thank you isn't enough!God bless you & your family!
-
The John T. Floyd Law Firm assisted me, and I can tell you that the attorney took the time to answer my questions, and I didn't feel rushed or dismissed as I have experienced in … More the past with attorneys. The attorney was very nice and extremely knowledgeable. Initial impressions and continued excellent customer service are big factors for me and as such I would highly recommend this firm.
-
I thank you for your efforts to help Felons regain their Civil rights, and for the information on possession , I am A convicted Felon, no violent history. I am an expert shot, I am … More 76 yoa, and very concerned about the present lake of Security in our State and Country. God Bless and Prosper you in your efforts, Your friend, Sonny Bivens
-
I really appreciated both Chris and John helping with my legal questions and concerns. Both are good guys and I would not hesitate to recommend them.
-
Extremely helpful!!! Helping me understand the law.
John T. Floyd is Board Certified in Criminal Law By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Request A Confidential Consultation
Fields marked with an * are required
"*" indicates required fields
Copyright © 2024 John T. Floyd Law Firm • All rights reserved.
Designed & Developed by
