Blog
DEFENDING THE WRONGLY ACCUSED
Houston Press Reports Our Victory in Court and Client’s Life After False Allegations
By:Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
One of our recent success stories was profiledin the cover story of theMay 6-12, 2010, edition of theHouston Press.InOh Hold, The Press exposed the hard reality that charges of child sex crimes can haunt a person for life, even though he may be exonerated before a jury of his peers, or, as it was in this case, after two separate trials and two “not guilty” verdicts.
Michael Serges was a Houston deputy constable when he was arrested in March 2008 for aggravated sexual assault. He was fired by Precinct 4 Constable Ron Hickman immediately after his arrest. Serges retained the John T. Floyd Law Firm to represent him. We knew it was going to be a difficult case. All child sexual assault cases are. This one involved a 7-year delayed outcry. The alleged victim was a former inmate in a local juvenile detention facility where Serges worked at the time (2000). She charged that Serges had raped her in the shower of the facility. The prosecutor would attempt to support victim’s charge with testimony from another former inmate at the same facility who was a twice-convicted felon by the time Serges was put to trial. The jury would also be presented with a very sympathetic complainant, one who was dying from lupus, who would be rolled into court in a wheel chair, wrapped in a blanket to warm her withering body and whose very breath required support from a nearby attached oxygen tank, a defense lawyer’s nightmare.The case would only grow worse as the investigator from the D.A’s office seemed to magically come up with four new “victims,” who stories were eerily, and unsettlingly, similar.
The first case’s difficulty was primarily due to it being a classic “she said/he said” case. The prosecution, of course, portrayed the victim as a “helpless” troubled child taken advantage of by a demented, corrupt prison guard. The opposite was the case. The complainants had long histories of lying (even by their own admissions), drug use, stealing, and serious psychological disorders. In fact, the sexual abuse allegations by one of the former inmates against Serges had been thoroughly investigated in 2000 by detention center staff, the Houston Police Department and the District Attorney’s office. The three law enforcement agencies determined the allegations were not credible, and, in fact, the alleged victim ultimately recanted the allegation, admitting that she had told lies against Serges in this particular instance and in other instances just to “get him in trouble.”
The District Attorney’s Office chose to continue with this case, we believe, primarily because of the massive scandal revealed in 2007 about prison guards abusing inmates throughout the state’s juvenile institutions. The prosecution bolstered its case by hauling in a “child sexual assault expert” from the Harris County Children’s Assessment Center (“CAC”) who testified that in such cases the “studies” and “literature” show that only 3 percent of children make false sexual assault allegations.
The jury didn’t buy the prosecution’s case. After three days of grueling testimony and cross examination, Serges was acquitted. We wrote about the acquittal and the reasons for it. Our jubilation was short lived, however. The District Attorney’s office, stunned and embarrassed by the jury’s harsh rejection of its case, announced it would try Serges on the second of the six cases it had remaining against him. Our defense team once again to had to gear up for another fight as we thoroughly investigated and prepared for this second case.
But in early December the District Attorney’s office pulled off one of its classic “slight of hand” maneuvers. It announced that it would try its third case rather than the second because the witness in the second case could not be located, which turned out to be either a mistake or a lie, as she was called to testify as a state’s witness just days later.
The firm’s Christmas holidays were effectively put on hold. We had to begin yet a third investigation because we faced a January 5, 2009 trial date. The District Attorney’s underhanded maneuver did not deter us. We were prepared for the January trial date and won a hard fought and unheard of second acquittal involving the same defendant charged with sexual assault of a second child.
After facing two acquittals in the Serges cases and a newly elected District Attorney in town, prosecutors stated they would not proceed with the remaining cases and eventually dismissed all the charges.Michael Serges wasfree man, he had been exonerated by two juries and the district attorney’s office had decided to dismiss the others.Well, his joy was suddenly dashed as he realized he could not longer find a job in law enforcement, a career he cherished.
Michael Serges did the only thing he could do: he took his case to the court of public opinion. The Houston Press discussed hardships Serges has faced since his acquittals. “The first time I was elated, overjoyed,” Serges toldPressreporter Chris Vogel. “After the second acquittal, though, I was upset. Angry that they put me through all of this again.”
That anger only intensified when Serges tried to get his old Precinct 4 constable job back. He was told that he would have to begin anew just like any other job applicant. ThePressreported that he took all the tests and passed them. He was told he should have no problem being hired. But two weeks later he received a letter from the Constable’s office informing him that he did not meet their new standards. “It doesn’t make any sense,” Serges told thePress. “Nothing is any different now from when I was working there before.”
Robert Goerlitz hit the proverbial nail on the head when discussing Serges’ case with thePress. “It someone is acquitted,” he said, “I don’t see why he shouldn’t be hired somewhere. Perception is everything with the public, and if the perception is that someone is guilty, then people hang onto that. And it affects your career because you carry that baggage even if you are innocent. Departments have to look at each case, and if there’s some evidence, but not enough to convict, then just don’t make him a school resources officer, but you shouldn’t be denied completely.”
Therein lies the crux of the problem. The jury foreman in Serges’ first acquittal was a business consultant named Gower Talley. He told thePressthat the prosecution’s case was a sham. “When the prosecution laid out the specific mechanics of what was supposed to have happened at the detention center,” he said, “it was improbable to the extreme and borderline impossible. We’re not talking, ‘Did he do it?’ We’re talking about whether it’s physically possible within that facility to do what he was accused of. It would have required multiple people being proactively complicit for the scenario to even be possible. Some of the accusations were demonstrably false. It was obscene.”
The prosecution understood this basic weakness in its case long before the trial ever commenced. It was the major thrust of our defense: that to accept the victim’s version of the events, there would had to have been a complete meltdown of all the facility’s security protocols; a meltdown that would had to have had the support of at least several other staff members. The prosecution’s case, through the victim’s testimony, simply did not comport with the physical realities of the facility.
So what did the prosecution do to offset this obstacle? They did what they normally do to bolster weak case, called in a child sex abuse “expert,” a hired gun to say children don’t lie about sex allegations.
In one of Serges’ trials, the prosecutor called child sexual assault expert Dr. Lawrence Thompson, from the Child Assessment Center, to bolster its weak case. The CAC is a quasi-official government agency partially funded by county and city government. It partners with the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, as well as with county and city law enforcement agencies, in handling and treating child sexual abuse cases.
Quite frequently Harris County law enforcement officers will receive a report that a child has been sexually abused. The officers will deliver the child to the CAC who will make a determination of whether a sexual assault has actually occurred. Based on this preliminary assessment, the officer, or an assistant district attorney to whom the report has been referred, will determine if there is probable cause for arrest. If a child sexual assault case results in arrest, indictment, and trial, the District Attorney’s Office will generally call CAC personnel to testify at the trial as “experts” in child sexual abuse.
To begin with, we strongly believe the CAC has a massive conflict of interest. Its mission “ is to provide a professional, compassionate, and coordinated approach to the treatment of sexually abused children and their families and to serve as an advocate for all children in our community.” Its mission, therefore, is not to serve as a “partner” with law enforcement and as “hired gun” for the District Attorney’s Office. In fact, the CAC over the past decade has actually morphed into a quasi-official law enforcement agency whose real “mission” is to secure criminal convictions against defendants charged with child sex offenses, not only to treat the victims of that abuse.
Dr. Thompson is one CAC’s regular “experts” in Harris County courtrooms, and at Serges’ trial, he reiterated the CAC’s standard message that children rarely ever make false or fabricated sexual assault allegations. Dr. Thompson is Director of the CAC’s Therapy and Psychological Services Department. This department provides “therapy, psychological assessment, and psychiatric evaluation of child victims and their family members to assist them throughout the healing process.” The department utilizes what is called a “holistic approach” in this healing process which translates into “treatment” of the mind, body and spirit. Within these parameters, the department offers “various types of therapies” provided by “professionals from several disciplines” whose work “are guided by a variety of theoretical orientations.”
We were extremely fortunate that jury did not accept Dr. Thompson’s testimony as infallible in the Serges case. But other defendants have not been as lucky. The District Attorney’s used Dr. Thompson in the Frederick Lane case. Lane was tried, convicted, and sentenced to sixty years in the state’s prison system for aggravated sexual assault of a child. The alleged victim’s was Lane’s daughter who testified her father forced her to perform oral sex on him and had anal intercourse with her. She said the sexual abuse went on for an extended period of time; that she did not report it because her father had threatened to kill the family if she told anyone. The daughter did not report the abuse until she turned 18 years of age. She was 24 years old at the time of Lane’s trial at which she testified that she still suffered from post-traumatic stress and had to undergo weekly therapy sessions.1/
Lane’s oldest daughter corroborated her sister’s story to a certain extent. She told the jury her father regularly awakened her sister at night and took her to the bathroom down the hall where the alleged abuse occurred. The oldest daughter, along with other members of the family, also testified they knew of no other reason why the youngest daughter would level the abuse charge unless it occurred.2/
This corroboration was not enough for the District Attorney’s office. They called Dr. Thompson and had him “testify as an expert in the field of child abuse and post-traumatic stress disorder.”3/Dr. Thompson first “educated” the jury with an unsubstantiated assertion that non-disclosure occurs in over half of all child sexual abuse cases. There was, and is, no credible authority to support such a bald conclusion. Dr. Thompson then informed the jury that false allegations of child abuse rarely ever occur:
Q. How about false allegations? Is that a big part of the studies regarding sexual abuse?
A. No, it’s not a big, big part. It is something that happens. There are false allegations of child sexual abuse, but what I can tell from the research and my clinical experience is that those allegations are extremely rare.4/
Lane’s defense counsel objected, telling the judge the doctor was attaching credibility to an entire group of people. The judge sustained the objection but that did not slow the relentless march by the prosecution to establish this point.
Q. Is this based on your training and experience in general, that is, the study of or the looking at the false accusations, is that something that you have done through your education and through your training and through your experience?
A. I have definitely observed all areas of child sexual abuse, including false allegations.
Q. And so how do about separating in a general way scientifically between a true allegation and a false allegation?
A. Well, in the false allegation abuse that I in my clinical experience has [sic] observed – have observed, the theme that was present in that was an adult coercing a child to say something happened that didn’t happen. Coaching is what it is referred to in the literature. So we have an adult coaching a child to say they were abused when they were not abused … And, again, it is a rare occurrence, but it is something that is documented in the literature and coaching of children has unfortunately happened.5/
While defense counsel made that one general objection to Dr. Thompson’s testimony, he did not follow it up with a motion for a mistrial, a request for an instruction from the judge to the jury that the doctor’s testimony should be disregarded, or another objection to the prosecution’s continued questioning about false allegations even though the judge had sustained the earlier general objection. Defense counsel compounded these tactical mistakes when he chose to revisit the false allegation issue on cross examination of Dr. Thompson:
Q. Okay. You indicated – you’ve indicated that the majority of false allegations involved an adult coaching a child?
A. Yes. Yes, in my clinical experience and in the literature.
Q. Have there been studies done to determine, give us any information, any data, about adults making false accusations and claiming that they were the victim?
A. No, there are no studies that I am aware of specific to that, but the general studies that I am aware of regarding all victims of child sexual abuse, adult or child, consistently show that child or adult do not make – tend to make false allegations of child sexual abuse.6/
The District Attorney’s office then called yet another CAC expert—a social worker named Myrna Engler who testified she had counseled Lane’s daughter on a weekly basis for fourteen weeks and was of the opinion the daughter suffered from post-traumatic stressed induced by childhood sexual abuse.7/
The prosecution’s closing argument illustrates just how important the District Attorney’s office considered the CAC expert testimony provided by Dr. Thompson and Ms. Engler:
“Also, the experts, not only do they have all this training and experience and education that we usually don’t have, in our case here you have Ms. Engler who actually spent 14 hours with the victim, not just the time we spent with her, but every week, hour after hour after hour. And that could help you, if it does, decide whether or not [the victim] is a credible person. That’s why the experts brought to you and we talked about experts and everybody said that they can keep an open mind and listen to experts … We learned from the expert that fabrications on sexual assault is extremely rare based on the paper, the studies, and the research. That’s what the experts tell you and that’s what they testify to. It is extremely rare that somebody would come up and just make an allegation like that … When you think of an allegation like that, though, what’s the first thing you do, like I talked about earlier. The credibility of the witness. Well, what’s going on? Is the allegation being made because it is true or is there some other reason?”8/
Well-established Texas jurisprudence, which the prosecution was surely aware of when it prosecuted the Lane case, provides that a witness’ credibility is determined by the jury, not by experts.9/The Fourteenth District Court of Appeals held that both Dr. Thompson and Ms. Engler’s testimony was inadmissible. Dr. Thompson, the court noted, effectively told the jury it could believe the victim’s testimony because children rarely make false sexual abuse allegations. Likewise, the court said Ms. Engler told the jury it could believe the victim because she (Ms. Engler) had determined the victim had experienced childhood sexual abuse and suffered from post-traumatic stress as a result.10/
In yet another Harris County case Dr. Thompson was also utilized as an expert witness. This case involved John Wilson Herrera who was also found guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to 15 years in prison.11/The victim in the Herrera case was a 13-year-old boy. Absent any medical evidence, the case boiled down to the classic “he said/he said.” The youngster said the sexual abuse occurred; Herrera said it didn’t. The District Attorney’s office knew the victim’s credibility would be the key issue for the jury to decide. The prosecution, therefore, made a calculated decision to have Dr. Thompson testify about the rarity of false sexual abuse allegations by children.12/
Dr. Thompson continued his professional spiel that non-disclosure occurs in 50 percent of all child sexual cases, thus any delay in disclosure does not affect the child’s credibility. The prosecution then elicited testimony from Dr. Thompson about “characteristics” of sex offenders, child sexual assault victims, and the possible “psychological effects” of sexual assault on children. It was Herrera’s defense counsel who elected to open the door to the rarity of false sexual abuse allegations by children with the following line of questioning:
Q. As a clinician and in your training you were taught to look for false allegations; is that correct?
A. Could you be more specific? You say I was taught to look for false allegations?
Q. You’re aware that false allegations can occur?
A. I am aware that false allegations can occur.
Q. And, as a clinician, when you interview somebody, that would be something you would take into account, right?
A. Yes.
Q. I mean, you wouldn’t automatically assume just because the child said—or is sitting in front of you that—I know you wouldn’t voice this to the child, but you wouldn’t automatically assume this child is telling the truth without hearing a word the child said, right?
A. No. I mean, in fact and in the way of doing mental health work, psychotherapy, you just try and meet the child where they are at, wherever they are at.
Q. Right. I mean, because making a false allegation like this could be a sign of a different mental health issue, right?
A. Could be.
Q. Now, you said delayed outcry occurs in roughly 50 percent of these cases, is that right?
A. Over 50 percent. You know, different studies point to different numbers; but what I can say is generally that number – that there is a delayed outcry in more than half of all cases.13/
Defense counsel pursued several other lines of inquiry but persisted in returning to the false allegation issue.
Q. Is it possible that in order to try and gain trust or favoritism with a girlfriend, a 16- or 17-year-old could fabricate or lie about a sexual assault?
A. No. That’s not anything I ever encountered.
Q. Do you think it’s hypothetically possible?
A. I think most anything is hypothetically possible, but that type of fabrication is not something that I have encountered. And so it’s possible, but definitely not probable in my clinical experience.
Q. Well, let me ask you this: Doctor, if this hypothetical boy sees the girlfriend getting favorable treatment and being excused from her grade failing and things like that, do you think that might lead him to make a false disclosure?
A. No. No. What the literature and what my experience shows with regard to false disclosure is that … there is typically an element of coaching of a child, but I cannot tell you of one instance where a child has seen another child getting preferential treatment because they were sexually abused and then saying, “Let me say I have been sexually abused, too” to get the same preferential treatment. That has not been my experience.
Q. In a hypothetical situation, what about if it’s for a sexually active girl, hypothetically, sexually active boy, hypothetically, trying to gain trust with that girl to say, “I was sexually abused, also” to build that bond? Do you think that could happen?
A. Again, you know, anything is possible, but in my clinical experience and my knowledge of the literature, those are not the triggers for false allegations of abuse that we see.14/
On redirect examination, the prosecution, as it was permitted to do, sought to rehabilitate Dr. Thompson on the false allegations issue by asking:
Q. What about when you’re asked about false allegations or false disclosure, is that more likely to happen or less likely?
A. It’s less likely. I was able to reference this myself, that I speak of false allegations of abuse, but false allegations of abuse are very rare. Kids do not tend to make up allegations of child sexual abuse. In my clinical experience, and the literature supports this, in less than 2 to 4 percent at most of all cases which there is an allegation of sexual abuse is a child being coached or making a false allegation of abuse. It’s statistically a very rare phenomenon but it does—but it can happen.15/
The First District Court of Appeals rejected Herrera’s claim that Dr. Thompson had expressed a direct opinion about a witness’ credibility. The court distinguished Herrera’s case from the Lane case by pointing out that Herrera’s counsel opened the door to the false allegation issue.16/
The problem inherent in Dr. Thompson’s testimony in these two cases is that, first, much of it was not true, and, second, it was terribly misleading. Contrary to what Dr. Thompson said, there have been numerous credible studies which found that false allegations occur in 25% to 60% of all sexual assault allegations made in this country. And it is misleading to say non-disclosure occurs in more than 50% of all child sexual assault cases. At best, such a conclusion could only be an estimate—not an established scientific fact. It’s impossible to prove a negative. If a sexual assault is not disclosed, how can you possibly know for a fact that it occurred?
Testimony from “experts” like Dr. Thompson is difficult to overcome in child sexual assault cases. This kind of testimony vouches for the credibility of the child by effectively telling the jury that “children don’t lie” about sexual assaults. The inevitable question arises:what professional credentials qualify Dr. Thompson to testify as an “expert” about such matter? This question was answered by the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals in the case of Steven Briones who was convicted in Harris County of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to 50 years in the Texas prison system.17/
The alleged child sexual assault in the Briones case involved one of his three children, a daughter. The sexual abuse reportedly occurred following Briones’ divorce from his wife and during visitations by the children with their father. Six months after the alleged sexual abuse the daughter told her mother about the incidents. The mother contacted the police who took the daughter to the CAC where she was given “thorough physical examination, as well as an interview in which she was asked multiple questions about the incidents with Briones.”The exam and interview were conducted by Dr. Reena Isaac who testified at Briones’ trial about both. Based on the information obtained from the child by Dr. Isaac, Briones was arrested and subsequently indicted on the child sexual assault charge.18/
In addition to Dr. Isaac, Dr. Thompson also testified at Briones’ trial. Briones’ defense counsel objected to Dr. Thompson’s testimony, saying he was not qualified to testify as an “expert” and because his testimony was unreliable. It should be pointed out here that the prosecution called Dr. Thompson as a rebuttal witness after Briones and several family members told the jury the father and daughter interacted in a normal and loving fashion without any indications the daughter feared or disliked her father prior to the mother reporting the alleged abuse to the police.
Before allowing Dr. Thompson to testify, the trial judge conducted a “gatekeeper” hearing outside the jury’s presence to determine the doctor’s qualifications as an “expert” and the “appropriateness” of his intended testimony. This hearing was in response to objections made by Briones’ defense counsel that the prosecution had not specified the “area of scientific knowledge upon which Dr. Thompson would testify” or exactly how the doctor was “qualified to testify on that specific body of knowledge.”19/
Dr. Thompson then offered his qualifications:
- He has a masters degree and a PhD in clinical psychology;
- His “doctoral dissertation” concerned personality disorders and sexual abuse of children;
- He has served in a clinical and practical internship at the University of Michigan where he worked with child victims of sexual abuse and their families;
- He had worked with the CAC since 2001 at a staff psychologist and director of Therapy and Psychological Services Department;
- As a practicing psychologist, he had worked with and observed more than 300 child sexual assault victims; and
- He had maintained an ongoing study of literature in the field of child sexual assault.20/
Based on these academic and professional credentials, the trial court ruled Dr. Thompson was qualified to testify as an “expert.” The court of appeals concurred with that finding. The doctor told the jury in the Briones case that he was familiar with the behavior of child sexual assault victims and that it was not uncommon for some of these victims to behave normally around adult abusers; that they exhibited no outward signs of anxiety or depression.21/
Once again, the problem with Dr. Thompson’s testimony is that it was terribly misleading. Other “experts” in the field of child sexual assault have testified in Harris County courtrooms about a complete opposite mode of behavior exhibited by sexual abused children. For example, Dr. Barlee Roy testified in the case of Michael Wayne Cohn, who was convicted in Harris County of indecency with a child, that sexually abused children will experience “crying episodes” and “angry episodes” as well as experience concentration problems in school.22/
The Cohn and Briones cases not only underscore the duplicity of the Harris County District Attorney’s office with its use of child sexual assault “experts” but illustrate the diverse professional conclusions drawn by experts like Dr. Thompson and Dr. Roy. Dr. Thompson was used in the Briones case to provide the “expert” opinion that it’s “normal” for sexually abused children not to exhibit “anger” episodes while Dr. Roy was used in the Cohn case to show it’s “normal” for sexually abused children to exhibit “angry” episodes.
It makes no difference which “expert” was right or wrong. What is important is that these two cases reveal that the Harris County District Attorney’s Office utilizes child sexual assault “experts” as nothing more than “hired guns” to tell juries what the prosecution wants them to hear in a particular case. If the prosecution needs an expert to say “non-anger” is normal, the District Attorney’s Office can call on Dr. Thompson; and if the prosecution needs an expert to say “anger” is normal, they can call on Dr. Roy.
Beyond the misleading and quite often unfounded testimony of these so-called “experts” in child sexual assault cases, the most disturbing facet of this kind of testimony is that it is not required in child sexual assault cases. Texas jurisprudence is well-settled that the testimony of a child sexual victim alone is sufficient to sustain a conviction.23/The only reason the District Attorney’s Office employs these “experts” is to bolster and vouch for the veracity of the child victim. While an en banc court in the Cohn case said this kind of testimony is permissible because it is offered to “corroborate” and not vouch for a child victim’s testimony, every criminal defense attorney in this state understands why such “experts” are used in these cases. This kind of testimony has little to do with “corroboration”—evidence which is not needed in child sexual assault cases—and everything to do with “bolstering” and “vouching.”
The Michael Serges case not only reflects the enormous difficulties criminal defense attorneys face defending these cases before a jury, but the horrendous aftermath they inflict upon those wrongly accused. We managed to save Serges from a long stint in a state prison, but the prosecution has made sure that he will never truly be a free man again. The stigma of child sexual assault is just too great.
We wish him well.
SOURCES:
1/257 S.W.3d 22 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th] 2008)
2/ Id., at 24
3/ Id.
4/ Id.
5/ Id., at 24-25
6/ Id., at 25
7/ Id.
8/ Id., at 25-26
9/Young v. State, 872 S.W.2d 706 (Tex.Crim.App. 1993)
10/ 257 S.W.3d at 26
11/ Herrera v. State, 2009 Tex.App. LEXIS 4893 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist] June 25, 2009)
12/ Id., at Lexis 6
13/ Id., at Lexis 7-8
14/ Id., at Lexis 9-10
15/ Id., at Lexis 10
16/Id., at Lexis 11
17/ Briones v. State, 2009 Tex.App. 5944 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] July 30, 2009)
18/ Id., at Lexis 2
19/ Id., at Lexis 6
20/ Id., at Lexis 7
21/ Id.
22/ Cohn v. State , 849 S.W.2d 817 (Tex.Crim.App.1991)
23/ Tex. Code Crim. Pro.Art. 38.07;Sosa v. State, 2004 Tex.App. LEXIS 5215 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] June 15, 2004)
By:HOUSTON CRIMINAL LAWYER JOHN FLOYD AND PARALEGAL BILLY SINCLAIR
Take the first step toward protecting your freedom by contacting us now
Testimonials
John T. Floyd Law Firm
3730 Kirby Drive # 750, Houston
-
If you have hired attorneys that meet the Webster dictionary definition, ie: "Attorney " is a person that has a law degree, will not be totally honest, can take your money … More and not earn it, will put you off until he is ready to talk to you, and/or never study your case to be able to defend you. Mr. Floyd is the only attorney that doesn't fit that definition!! You will be delighted to have Mr. John Floyd in your corner! Not one attorney that I have ever met that would ever return a check that I sent to him, because he said I paid him too much! Wow! That right there should tell you something about his integrity!!!!! He has a very calm demeanor and doesn't stretch the truth even if you don't want to hear it, he will tell you the truth. Call and set up an appointment with him and judge for yourself. You are wasting time and money on any other attorney, just hire the best, Mr. Floyd.
-
John T. Floyd and his team are some of the best people! I was able to get a second opinion from them on legal advice. His team has been honest, kind, and very informative which has … More been a huge blesssing.
-
I highly recommend John T. Floyd Lawfirm. They are truly knowledgeable and willing to go the extra mile to defend your innocence. Psalms 35
-
Outstanding!Professional knowledge. Rich experiences. Good outcome.
-
-
The best lawyer I ever encounter with a very good personality. He’s very professional and he will go far and beyond for his clients best interest. He’s definitely a 5 star attorney … More when it comes to delivering. I couldn’t be more happier that I hired him !! 👏👏👏👏
-
-
I can honestly say from what I have seen so far, Floyd is a compassionate soul who cares for his client's. Floyd is by far very knowledgeable in this area. He's currently … More assisting my [Father] on a sex assault. We are all suffering so much as my father is an elder man, but we have faith in God, and Mr. Floyd he can dismissed this outrageous allegation soon. Thank you, yoli
-
I had wonderful experience with this law firm. They were so helpful and knowledgeable of the process.my case was dismissed because of Mr John T Floyd,thank you for everything .
-
I am very happy today my case dismissed God bless Mr John T Floyd very good lawyer thanks you so mush sir
-
I had a great experience with this Law Firm, the kind staff helped me locate a Lawyer even though they were unable to take my case.
They were very helpful, kind and returned my call … More in a timely manner. I would definitely recommend them and use them in the future. -
I can tell that Jone is an excellent attorney in Houston. Personally, he is a great man. In addition to great service and amazing results. Recommended
-
Mr. Floyd is an incredible attorney and human being. He cares about your case, the facts, the law, and your life! I am sorry for whatever situation you are going through, but choosing … More Mr. Floyd, his firm, and their professional experience to help you, will be the best decision you ever make!
-
John T Floyd is a straight shooter! He was very direct and responsive to my phone calls and questions. I was in awe of his knowledge, and professional decorum! The best decision that … More you could make is to schedule a consultation with him before considering anyone else!
-
I asked the Law Office of John T. Floyd a very important question regarding the legal aspects of purchasing a firearm with a deferred adjudication charge. They answered the question … More very professionally and accurately and I was quite pleased with the information that was shared. I recommend this law firm because they are very honest and will work for you and with you.
-
I’ve never been one to write reviews but this time I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to say something. I had some serious legal questions I needed answers to concerning Texas laws. … More Being I’m from another state, I found and reached out to Attorney John Floyd for the answers. Mr Floyd listened to to my requests and told me what he need from me and went out of his way to get me the answers. Very polite, straightforward and professional, I can’t thank him enough for all he’s done. Whatever your legal case may be, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Mr Floyd.
-
John & Chris helped my family member get a reduced charge and acceptable plea agreement in place. Their compassion, attention to every detail was what helped carry the day.Truly … More the best of the best.P
-
Mr. Floyd is both ethical and loyal to his clients; two qualities that are hard to find specially in lawyers. I'd definitely recommend him to anyone.Positive
Professionalism …More … More -
Mr. John was very helpful and truly was the reason why my case was dismissed. Thank you so much Mr. John I truly recommend everyone in need to work with him.
-
His service to the community and diligence to helping his clients speaks for its self! Not to mention the many articles, papers and TV appearances that speak to his intellect
-
John has given Excellent service and have been very friendly and extremely helpful to us. I highly recommend this law firm
-
This law firm is diligent, responsive and succeeded in getting my case dismissed. 10/10 would recommend.
-
super knowledgeable, good attitude, would definitely recommend him
-
Very helpful, knowledgeable and honest.
-
John is an amazing person and lawyer who is actually very understanding of how anxious I got and although it was hard to reach him sometimes because of his schedule, but never worry … More he is on top of things. He is very organized, very smart. I had the experience to go through a trial with him, and he always plans ahead well and is actually open and receptive to any ideas and comments I had and he was quick to decide which is right to use at the moment. I really appreciated working with him and Chris. Great lawyers and great people. As I was reminded by John, I am adding that the Jury reached a not guilty decision on the original charge and on a lesser charge in just 25 minutes. It took more time to write the charge and instructions for the jury than it took them to reach a decision.
-
Highly recommend John T Floyd law firm, great response time and demeanor.I was researching an on-going criminal case, when I found an informative article written by John Floyd (about … More the perils of expert testimony). I called his office, and was very pleased to receive a timely call back. Not only was Mr. Floyd candid and helpful, but he had the kindest demeanor of any attorney that I've dealt with. I am so glad to have found this firm.
-
Although I am not a client, John Floyd contacted me the same day I sent an email requesting advice, answered my questions and even when further to assist with my issue and communicated … More with me the next day. A true credit to his profession and I can only imagine how well he provides services to his actual clients!
-
I give Mr. Floyd 10 Stars if they were available so I'm giving him five that's all that's available. The first time I left a message for him it was on a Friday after … More 5 p.m. and within 15 minutes he called me back I told him I needed to buy a lotto ticket because that has never happened. I knew from our chat and him calling me back that he was different from any attorney I've tried to talk to left messages never got called back they didn't even know what I needed and neither did Mr. Floyd but he did call me back. I was very interested in meeting with mr. Floyd about my case because I felt he was very transparent honest and genuine. If you've ever dealt with attorneys they don't have those traits but Mr. Floyd does. He was very honest with me told me what I could and could not do with my case. He is not egotistical he's very compassionate and he actually reads the documents you sent him unbelievable that's never happened. He will be the only lawyer I refer to anyone that needs his expertise. If you're in need of a criminal defense attorney please give John T Floyd a call you will not be disappointed.
-
Mr John is a great human being and a very knowledgeable attorney. He has always called me back promptly,advised me very clearly and never rushed our conversation. i was wrongfully accused … More and Mr John had my case DISMISSED!! on the day of trial after fighting for me for two years. I am very thankful to the John T. Floyd Law Firm. You will not go wrong with John. Mr John you deserve way more then 5 stars.Thank youShaikh.
-
John Floyd Law Firm is highly recommended for your legal needs. He and his staff are highly professional in every aspect. Easy and comfortable feeling talking with him, and he understands … More your needs and explains your legal advice in a way you can understand. Enough just cant be said. Thank You Sir.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John was kind enough to assist me with legal advise on my firearm gun rights restoration. I highly recommend him and his firm. Very professional and knowledgeable. If I need assistance … More in the future I will definitely go back to him.
-
What I liked the most was that he actually returned my phone after leaving a message unlike pretty much everyone else I called prior. He listened and answered my question with the best … More advice that would benefit me the most. I was actually lost from moving to Texas from a different state we’re laws vary and he pointed me toward the right direction to get a understanding of if I need to do business with him now or after I contact a lawyer in my home state.
-
John T Floyd handled my sons case & got a dismissal for us! He is great to work with, gets back to you promptly & knows what he’s doing. Definitely one of the best we have had … More to deal with!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John is honestly the best! The whole team is. He answered me in a timely manner and helped me when my friend was going through a situation in Houston, Texas as an inmate. He was so … More thorough, honest, and without charging me sent me so much information because I was out of the loop. He never once tried to take you for your money, he did all that he could to. help me and I can't thank him enough.
-
I have used John on two occasions and found him to have full knowledge of Texas law, diligent, creative in plan, and aggressive in defense. He is the best criminal defense attorney … More in the State of Texas. No reason to look elsewhere.
-
I have been calling to get some legal advice pertaining to gun rights. A few legal offices would not even take my call because quote " your not a client and Im losing money. … More I I called John T. Floyd Law Firm and they were not only able to answer my question, but gave great detail information, and further elaborated on their answer. I hope I do not have to use them in the future, but if I do need to, they will be my first call.
-
Great lawyer! Needed some advice and gave me a Consultation, and advice for steps to take, without any hassle l, Was a honest guy and actually wanted to help me and not just take my … More money! Highly recommend!!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Attorney Floyd replied very timely to my inquiry and he provided practical advice. I will not hesitate to contact him in the future if I need additional legal counsel.
-
Highly recommend, down to earth lawyer. Talked to me about my legal issues without being super money hungry and genuinely wanted to help me with my legal problems. 5 stars ⭐️.
-
Very knowledgeable and professional. I called and left a message Friday morning and before end of business that day I received a call back.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism … More …More -
Very helpful highly recommended for any Question / case will definitely keep he's name and number for any other legal advice
-
Excellent service and a lawyer that doesn't lie. He does what he says. JW recommends him.
-
One of the best services Ive used in awhile. Thank you for all the help and answers. You got my life back. Thank youPositive
Quality …More -
Im impressed. This guy was polite and professional and most important...he listened.
-
Good experience and very good lawyer
-
-
-
Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, ValueMore -
It was a pleasure speaking with John. He is knowledgeable and has a true desire to help the people of society. I turned to him for some guidance of a long-standing issue. He never … More rushed our conversation and went out of his way to look into the details to provide the right answer as well as assist me anyway he could. Thank you for our conversations and I wish your and your firm the best. If you need a lawyer, John Floyd is your guy!
-
John represented me in court for roughly 2 years. I won't (and shouldn't) get into any serious details, but let me tell you that I couldn't have chosen anyone better. … More Seriously.Every appearance in court I felt very comfortable. The judge and DA's had a high regard for his reputation. There is a time I recall where simply his presence greatly impacted the court's interpretation of my case and persons. We were in front of the stand and the judge could not stop talking about John's prestige and past accomplishments and how that took in relation to my case. I kept silent in front of the judge, but I observed then that John's popularity and reputation within the court had already given me a better looking rapport with the judge. Let me tell you, I never had more confidence then, knowing that the judge held him in such high regard.This is not to mention how personable John is. I'll be honest that during the stress of court, sharing a laugh with your lawyer helps a lot. This may sound a lot, but I really appreciated the relationship we had then. This is also not to mention that he was able to deal very well with any DA that rotated over the years. Seriously, John was great, prompt with information and very hands on with my case. I had great peace those 2 years until everything wrapped up.If you're looking for a lawyer, I highly, HIGHLY recommend the John T. Floyd Law Firm. He IS nationally renowned, you know. He'll get the job done to the utmost confidence. He's very experienced and has a great record to boot. I am glad to have had him represent me in court and trust me that I never thought I'd ever say that (and whoever does?). We explored every avenue of victory together and I personally enjoyed the experience, despite the seriousness of the accusation.If you have a case that needs to be represented at the highest levels, choose John T. Floyd. He's a good man and very good at what he does. Him and his team has the experience you need to make the best decisions and options to get the best outcome for your case. We got the best result I could possibly ask for, thank God.Seriously. Hire John. He knows what he's doing.Seriously.
-
One of the few honest lawyers I have ever talked to. His complimentary consultation was knowledgeable and thorough. He knew exactly what the issue was and how to handle it. His candid … More appraisal of the situation and how to proceed saved me thousands of dollars in legal fees. If you have a case requiring expertise in John's area of practice, look no further. Hire this man!
-
I had the opportunity to read an article that Mr. Floyd wrote and it was very interesting. I called him about the article and advice concerning a similar situation. He not only gave … More me excellent advice, he pointed out not just what I wanted to hear but what I needed to hear concerning my situation. The Good, The Bad and The ugly in a manner or speaking. He spoke with an open and honest heart with information to help me and not just to get a client.
-
If you are in trouble and need a lawyer, contact the John T. Floyd law firm. Some of the best lawyers in Texas work there! Understanding and helpful lawyers and staff that will do all … More they can to help you 😊
-
He gave me one of the most honest answers I have received in a very long time about any issue I was having with anything. Legal or not legal. I highly recommend giving him a call and … More will be referring him to friends and family if they have any issues in the future.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He took time out of his day to answer my legal questions and didn’t even charge me. I would definitely recommend him to you.
-
Gave free consultation on getting gun rights back. He truly cares about gun rights and getting you the help you deserve. 100% worth a callPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, … More Value …More -
Very professional, great quality work, and very friendly and helpful. Overall, their service is phenomenal. I recommend Mr. Floyd to anyone.
-
Mr. Floyd took the time to explain his experience with the law to me in layman's terms. Definitely give him a call.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He was honest , knowledgeable , and professional about what we talked about. Most lawyers are just about the money , but not john.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He was very truthful and honest with us very great man I would recommend him and we would use him again
-
Very professional honest and works hard currently working my husband’s appeal I pray he does his best workPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I contacted John T. Floyd Law firm and I was very satisfied with service extremely helpful and friendly thank you Mr. FloydPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More … More -
This law frim was informative,great response time ,and the attorney called back not some secretary or legal assistant thank u guys for all your help wish it was more like youPositive … More
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I would highly recommend Mr Floyd. He was very helpful and knowledge with a legal question I had.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He explained my case better then any other lawyerPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Very informative
-
-
-
-
Had the pleasure speaking with John Floyd on a personal matter, he was very responsive, nothing but exceptional, and he really cares about you with sincerity and most importantly knows … More what is he talking about! No games or bs, his approach to my situation even though I knew it was probably way smaller then what he normally takes on, he was extremely helpful and didn't care about the size of the matter like other attorneys do. He really looked out for my best interests. You can tell he has decades of experience doing what he does just by chatting with him. I would highly recommend him.
-
Words can’t describe how grateful I am for working with John, he went above and beyond my expectation. I was wrongly accused and hired many lawyers before hiring John Floyd but they … More all disappointed me, I had lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to John. From the start he had my best interest in mind and gave helpful advice, he explained the process and guided me. He put more work and time than all my previous lawyers that cost me thousands of dollars. He was constantly communicating with court and defended me more than all lawyer i had hired before him. Don’t waste your time and money like I did, believe me when I say I hired countless lawyers before him and no one came close to John. I’m forever thankful for him for fighting for my innocence and getting my case dismissed. Thank you so much🙏🏼🙏🏼
-
I called Mr Floyd and left a message, with in the hour I received a call back with much more information then I could have ever expected. Mr Floyd was very informative on every question … More I had for him. He seemed like he cared, instead of like most attorneys that you talk to that are just out for a quick buck. If you want someone that is going to shoot strait with you, and has your best interest in hand, this is you guy. This was the best experience that I have ever had with an lawyer.
-
I can state with confidence that Mr. Floyd and his team are the most competent and professional lawyers one can hope for. My case was quite complex and I admit that as a law student … More I was not the most patient client. Mr. Floyd did a phenomenal job of managing the bench, prosecution and myself! The result was above expectation, and I will never hesitate to recommend this firm regardless of the caliber of the case at issue.
-
It was a pleasure working with Mr. Floyd. I contacted him regarding a legal matter and he was extremely knowledgeable about the law, and responded in a timely manner. I appreciated … More the fact I did not feel rushed, and he made sure he thoroughly answered all questions I had. I would highly recommend him!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
Spoke with John Floyd about a 45 year old criminal case I was involved in. I had very little information about the case and John helped me search what records were available and gave … More me guidance to find more information. He was very professional and took his time helping me. I may need to hire a lawyer on this case and Mr. Floyd will be the man.Thanks John.
-
Very professional and straight forward. He's not going to waste your time or money. Very knowledgeable in a large range of possible matters one could face living in these days … More and times. If ever you need legal assistance, this is who I would suggest. Awesome!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I called about some legal questions I needed to get clarified and John was able to give me clarification and sound advice. I will definitely contact John for all future legal questions … More and issues.Thank you John!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism, Value …More -
Knows his stuff and well respected with DA and judges. I have referred him a couple times and every client has been satisfied
-
John is beyond knowledgeable! If I decide to pursue my case any further I would only have him represent me.
-
What a great attorney, this guy really took time out of his day to answer my questions and explain my case to me. Very grateful, thank you so muchPositive
Professionalism …More -
Absolutely a very professional lawyer. Very well read in the current law and more than willing to help if needed.
-
Mr. John he’s a professional he knows what he’s doing and he’s patient they recommend Him stronglyPositive
Professionalism …More -
Great service, very knowledgable and happy to help with any questions I had
-
Quick to action and helpful and knowledgeable with entertainment industry based issues!
-
Responded on a holiday week. Very knowledgeable and reassuring.
-
Very professional
-
-
-
-
I want to thank John T. Floyd and all of his team. He is the best lawyer who cares aboutHis clients and fights really hard to get the best outcome. He is a fighter and he is awesome!!!I … More recommend if any one needs criminal defense , he is the BEST. We had a really serious caseAnd we are very thankful for the outcome. Thank you John!!!!! God bless you!!!!!!
-
The attorneys at John T. Floyd Law Firm work diligently to achieve the best possible results for their clients. They are caring and knowledgeable professionals. Their expertise in the … More law and their experience as trial attorneys makes them the right choice as a defense attorney. I recommend this law firm highly.
-
From beginning to end this firm handled my case like the top tier professionals they are. I would not trust ANYONE else with my legal needs after having less than stellar experiences … More with other teams. Thank you Floyd!!!
-
I really felt like the team cared about my case and am super satisfied with the outcome. Would not recommend anyone else!
-
These guys do amazing work and have phenomenal service! Hands down best in the Houston area!!
-
John and Chris are true professionals! Love those guys like family!
-
Mr. Floyd and his team are very knowledgeable, informative, and helpful.
-
A team you can depend on to stand up and fight for you to prove the truth the whole truth!
-
-
Mr. John T. Floyd represented me.I couldn't be happier with the outcome he managed to achieve on an VERY Important case that was dismissed the day of Trial. He is patient & … More very knowledgeable of the legal system. I HIGHLY recommend him to anyone in need of a lawyer!John, I am forever grateful & satisfied with the effort you put forth & all you did for me. Thank you isn't enough!God bless you & your family!
-
The John T. Floyd Law Firm assisted me, and I can tell you that the attorney took the time to answer my questions, and I didn't feel rushed or dismissed as I have experienced in … More the past with attorneys. The attorney was very nice and extremely knowledgeable. Initial impressions and continued excellent customer service are big factors for me and as such I would highly recommend this firm.
-
I thank you for your efforts to help Felons regain their Civil rights, and for the information on possession , I am A convicted Felon, no violent history. I am an expert shot, I am … More 76 yoa, and very concerned about the present lake of Security in our State and Country. God Bless and Prosper you in your efforts, Your friend, Sonny Bivens
-
I really appreciated both Chris and John helping with my legal questions and concerns. Both are good guys and I would not hesitate to recommend them.
-
Extremely helpful!!! Helping me understand the law.
John T. Floyd is Board Certified in Criminal Law By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Request A Confidential Consultation
Fields marked with an * are required
"*" indicates required fields
Copyright © 2024 John T. Floyd Law Firm • All rights reserved.
Designed & Developed by
